2022
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing removing versus retaining antral pseudocyst: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Objectives: To retrospectively compare multilevel volumetric changes in both hard and soft tissues between antral pseudocyst (AP) removal and retainment before maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) and immediate implant placement. Material and methods:Twenty-six patients with 38 implants placed from 2016 to 2021 were included and divided according to a cohort design as follows: 13 removing the cyst (RC group) and 13 "leaving alone" the cyst (LC group). 3D radiographic parameters (primary outcome), 2D param… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We summarize the principal progress in recent research on this topic (Table 1). Fu et al [21] conducted a retrospective cohort study, dividing 26 patients into two groups (13 in the "removing the cyst group" and 13 in the "leaving the cyst alone" group). The results showed that antral pseudocyst removal before maxillary sinus floor augmentation and immediate implant placement after lateral sinus floor elevation could achieve higher bone graft volumetric stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We summarize the principal progress in recent research on this topic (Table 1). Fu et al [21] conducted a retrospective cohort study, dividing 26 patients into two groups (13 in the "removing the cyst group" and 13 in the "leaving the cyst alone" group). The results showed that antral pseudocyst removal before maxillary sinus floor augmentation and immediate implant placement after lateral sinus floor elevation could achieve higher bone graft volumetric stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scanning parameters were set at 12 mA, 110 kV, 3.6–4.8 s exposure time, 15 × 12 mm 2 field of view, and 0.3 mm voxel size. One trained investigator (Zhikang Wang) used the Green Lander® picture archiving and communication system to evaluate the imaging data 25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One trained investigator (Zhikang Wang) used the Green Lander ® picture archiving and communication system to evaluate the imaging data. 25 The following preoperative sinus anatomical parameters were measured: (1) RBH: height of the alveolar bone at the position where the implant was planned to be placed, 26 (2) Schneiderian membrane condition: Schneiderian membrane condition was evaluated on CBCT sagittal sections and classified into "no thickening above 2 mm," "flat membrane thickening (>2mm)," "dome-like thickening," and "mixed flat and dome-like thickening," 26,27 (3) sinus width: the distance between the buccal sinus and palatal sinus walls at a 10-mm level from the residual alveolar crest, 19 (4) presence of septa: the presence of septa was identified on CBCT sagittal sections at the presumed implantation site, which was defined as "yes" or "no." 28…”
Section: Radiographic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APs are a pathological condition that can affect MSA outcomes. The presence of APs can complicate surgical procedures by increasing the risk of membrane perforation and postoperative complications [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%