Maxillary sinus balloon lifting and deferred implantation of 50 osseointegrated implants: a prospective, observational, non-controlled study

López-Quiles, Juan; Melero-Alarcón, C.; Cano-Durán, Jorge A.; Sánchez-Martínez-Sauceda, E.I.; Ortega, Rosa

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2018.04.014

Cited by 9 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Postoperative pain was examined using pain intensity scale (PIS) in the first 10 days, the mean pain score in the osseodensification group was 3.00 with SD ±2.28, while in the osteotome group the mean postoperative pain was 4.17 with SD ± 2.31. The pain was mild to moderate in the 2 groups in agreement with López-Quiles (23) in 2018. Postoperative edema was measured by pitting in the first 10 days, the mean edema score for osseodensification group was 1.33 with SD ± 0.51, for osteotome group the mean edema score was 2.17 with SD ±0.98, in both groups there was mild postoperative edema groups in agreement with López-Quiles et al (23).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 77%

“…The study was performed in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. The criteria of patient selection included (14,15): Patients with missing maxillary premolars and molars, vertical bone height of 5-8 mm, nonsmokers and good oral hygiene. The criteria excluded patients with bad oral hygiene, maxillary sinusitis, presence of infection or periapical lesions in adjacent teeth, bruxism or clenching, alcoholism, multiple sinus septa and patients taking medications or patients with medically compromised conditions that affect the procedure (14,15).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The criteria of patient selection included (14,15): Patients with missing maxillary premolars and molars, vertical bone height of 5-8 mm, nonsmokers and good oral hygiene. The criteria excluded patients with bad oral hygiene, maxillary sinusitis, presence of infection or periapical lesions in adjacent teeth, bruxism or clenching, alcoholism, multiple sinus septa and patients taking medications or patients with medically compromised conditions that affect the procedure (14,15). Preoperative assessment Full personal history was taken including patient 's name, age, occupation, address, phone number and phone number of a close relative along with past medical and dental history, taken carefully to exclude any medical condition that may affect the implant success.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome for Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Lifting With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Elghobashy

Shaaban

Melek

2022

Alexandria Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION:Implant placement in the posterior maxilla is problematic, not only due to inferior properties of bone but also due to loss of vertical bone height which happens after extraction of posterior teeth. When the required additional height is few millimeters, indirect transcrestal sinus lifting procedures is recommended. This study was carried out to compare clinically transcrestal sinus lifting with Densah burs versus osteotome with simultaneous implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS:This study was designed to be randomized clinical trial, a total of 11 patients with missing maxillary premolars or molars and with limited vertical bone height below the maxillary sinus floor (5 to 8 mm) received 12 implants either with osteotome or with osseodensification transcrestal sinus lifting. The 11 patients were divided into 2 groups, group A received osseodensification sinus lifting, group B received osteotome sinus lifting. Clinical follow up was done over 6 months. Results: No significant difference was detected regarding postoperative pain and edema. The P value (0.002*) showed a statistically significant difference in the operation time between the 2 groups. The mean of primary stability in densah bur group was 66.17 ±9.57, while the mean in the osteotome group was 54.83 ±7.19. The P value was (0.043*) showed a significant difference in primary stability between both groups. Also there was a significant difference in secondary stability between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Both osseodensification and osteotome technique showed a good clinical outcome in 6 months follow up, with better implant stability in the osseodensification cases.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 77%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome for Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Lifting With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Elghobashy

Shaaban

Melek

2022

Alexandria Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In presented study, Schneiderian membrane perforation occur in one case during osteotomy which excluded from the study and this was confirmed clinically by valvalsa maneuver and treated with collagen membrane without using bone graft to prevent leakage of bone graft to sinus cavity. This finding was supported by López-Quiles, J (27) in 2018 during study of Maxillary sinus balloon lifting and deferred implantation of 50 Osseointegrated implants in 27 patients sinus membrane perforation occurred in one case.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Evaluation of transalveolarcrestal maxillary sinus lifting with sinus balloon technique and implant placement

Abdalhameed

Alfakhrany

Elfar³

2022

Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the sinus balloon technique via transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation. Subjects and Methods: The current study was conducted on 12 patients with their age ranged from 16 to 45 years, with limited bone height below the floor of the maxillary sinus. they were divided into two groups. Group A patients received dental implants after sinus lifting using ballooning technique, while in group B patients received dental implants after transcrestal sinus lifting using Osteotomes. The bone density and bone height were measured by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Results: Successful sinus lifting with balloon technique and osteotome technique with superior clinical and radiographic results of balloon technique. The radiographic examination showed the mean elevated height after 6 months in group A was 11.72±2.16mm. While in group B was 8.05±1.90 mm. Conclusion: Balloon technique and osteotome technique are successful methods for sinus membrane lifting with superior clinical and radiographic results balloon technique.

show abstract

“…The mandibular implants are stable support for maxillary implant insertion to be used as a solid base for implantation when maxillary thinning [2]. Prior to maxillary sinus implantation, it should be controlled by the elevation of maxillary sinus mucosa via the sinus lift procedure [3]. During the maxillary implants, the maxilla is thickened by bone grafts as bone transplantation in the presence of excessive maxillary pneumatization [4], thereby increasing the dental implant success rate [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of the maxillary sinus complications after dental implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jamali

Nasrabadi

Payahoo

et al. 2020

BDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and aim: Endoscopic sinus surgery owing to its satisfactory prognosis and low complication is considered as the first line of surgical procedure. Implant failure is often reported despite efforts in recent years. The purpose of this study was to review the factors leading to side effects in dental implantation of the maxillary sinus. Material and Methods: The systematic search was performed on electronic databases of MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ISI, Google scholar to find corresponding articles regarding dental literature during 2010 to 2019. Electronic title management was carried out by Endnote X9 software. Searches were based on the keywords of “dental implants”, “Implants”,” dental”,” maxilla”, “sinusitis”. Results: The searched potentially relevant titles and abstracts were related to 294 articles, 104 of which were excluded due to lack of study inclusion criteria. At last, 11 articles were included into the final analysis. Postoperative sinusitis was found in 78 patients within 9 articles among 1195 patients. The implant failure was reported in 136 cases and the sinus membrane perforation in 185 sinuses within 11 articles among 1372 sinus lift procedures. Conclusion: The findings showed that the risk factors of sinusitis after implant surgery were Schneiderian membrane rupture and preoperative sinusitis, as well as smoking and residual bone height were the parameters elevating the dental implant failure risk.KEYWORDSSinusitis; Dental implants; Implant failure.

show abstract

Maxillary sinus balloon lifting and deferred implantation of 50 osseointegrated implants: a prospective, observational, non-controlled study

Cited by 9 publications

References 24 publications

Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome for Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Lifting With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome for Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Lifting With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Evaluation of transalveolarcrestal maxillary sinus lifting with sinus balloon technique and implant placement

Management of the maxillary sinus complications after dental implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About