Maxillary sinus and ridge augmentations using a surface-derived autogenous bone graft

Peleg, Michael; Garg, Arun; Misch, Craig M.; Mazor, Ziv

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.048

Cited by 69 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…After backward linear regression, there was significant evidence that the use of chin bone grafts would have a positive effect on the amount of TBV as compared with iliac bone grafts. Chin bone grafts increase the TBV by 10.7% at a confidence interval of [1.3%, 20.1%] and a p-value of 0.026 (Table 8). …”

Section: Donor Sitementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In all subgroups, a collagen barrier membrane was placed over the graft according to the principal of guided bone regeneration. [19][20][21][22] Further, Peleg et al 20 described the use of lypophilized duramater for such a purpose. Core biopsies were obtained after a healing period of 3-6 months with a mean TBV of 31.5-70%.…”

Section: Donor Sitementioning

confidence: 99%

“…14 It has been shown that also bone grafts, harvested from intraoral sites other than the chin, lead to a significantly higher TBV as compared with iliac crest bone. Complications related to the harvesting of intraoral bone are seldom reported, especially using the shaving technique described by Peleg et al 20 Scarano et al compared different materials in maxillary sinus floor augmentation, including intraoral autologous bone grafts. 34 Almost all autologous bone particles were completely surrounded by newly formed bone.…”

Section: Donor Sitementioning

confidence: 99%

“…9,45 Surprisingly, this could not be confirmed by meta-analysis of the four selected papers. [19][20][21][22] Particulated and block grafting After statistical analysis, particulation of the bone graft seems to lead to a significantly lower amount of TBV, where there is no such evidence for bone blocks. In literature, it is reported that up to 33% of the autologous bone graft can resorb during the initial 6 months after sinus floor augmentation surgery.…”

Section: Klijn Et Almentioning

confidence: 99%

“…9 For example, some studies advise to apply a resorbable or nonresorbable barrier membrane over the sinus graft osteotomy site. [19][20][21][22] Till now, no studies have been published that evaluated histological and histomorphometric data from a large amount of patients inventorying these variables. To answer the question as to which approach is the best in using autologous bone grafts after sinus floor augmentation surgery, a metaanalysis was conducted.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Sinus Floor Augmentation Surgery Using Autologous Bone Grafts from Various Donor Sites: A Meta-Analysis of the Total Bone Volume

Klijn

Meijer

Bronkhorst

et al. 2010

Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To date, no studies have been published that evaluated histomorphometric data from a large number of patients while comparing different sites and methods of autologous bone grafting in sinus floor augmentation procedures. A meta-analysis of the English literature from January 1995 till April 2009 was carried out. Results: Out of 147 titles, according to our criteria, 25 articles were left for analysis. The majority were prospective controlled studies (21) and 2 randomized clinical trials, 1 pilot study and 1 case series. A reference value of 47% for total bone volume (TBV) was found while using iliac bone grafting as a standard. Use of intraoral bone grafts increases the TBV, with 11% for chin bone and 14% for bone grafted from other intraoral sites. Particulation of the bone graft has a negative effect on the TBV of 18%. Surprisingly, no correlation between TBV and the time of graft healing was found. Histological section thickness seemed to be a significant variable, as every micron increase of section thickness leads to an increase of 0.4% of TBV. Conclusions: Bone grafting from the iliac crest resulted in a significantly lower TBV compared with intraoral bone grafting. However, due to the limited availability of intraoral bone to be harvested, iliac grafts still have to be considered the gold standard in augmenting the severely atrophic maxilla.

show abstract

Section: Donor Sitementioning

confidence: 99%