2023
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-023-00695-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAW: the reproducible Metabolome Annotation Workflow for untargeted tandem mass spectrometry

Abstract: Mapping the chemical space of compounds to chemical structures remains a challenge in metabolomics. Despite the advancements in untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) to achieve a high-throughput profile of metabolites from complex biological resources, only a small fraction of these metabolites can be annotated with confidence. Many novel computational methods and tools have been developed to enable chemical structure annotation to known and unknown compounds such as in silico generated sp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Metabolome Annotation Workflow (MAW) was used to perform dereplication using spectral databases (GNPS [26], Massbank [27], and HMDB [28, 29]), and compound databases integrated with SIRIUS4 [30, 31]. The results were post-processed and each distinct feature was assigned a list of putative structures with Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI) confidence levels of identification [22, 32, 33]. Table 1 shows the number of unique features annotated within each MSI level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Metabolome Annotation Workflow (MAW) was used to perform dereplication using spectral databases (GNPS [26], Massbank [27], and HMDB [28, 29]), and compound databases integrated with SIRIUS4 [30, 31]. The results were post-processed and each distinct feature was assigned a list of putative structures with Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI) confidence levels of identification [22, 32, 33]. Table 1 shows the number of unique features annotated within each MSI level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we performed the metabolome annotation of the mass spectrometry data obtained from S. marinoi to comprehend the chemical composition of the primary and specialised metabolites produced by the diatom. We annotated molecular structures, chemical classes, and molecular formulae to MS features obtained with High-resolution Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-ESI-Orbitrap MS 2 ) using Metabolome Annotation Workflow (MAW) [22]. The findings of this study contribute to the expansion of known marine natural products derived from S. marinoi .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MS 2 fragmentation spectra were acquired in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode for the precursor masses ( m / z ) in the inclusion list of selected high-intensity peaks from MS 1 spectra. MAW (22) was used to annotate chemical structures from spectral databases and the COCONUT database (23) to the MS 2 spectra. The number of features annotated within each MSI level is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical structure annotation was performed using the Metabolome Annotation Workflow (MAW) (22). All four conditions (endo_pos, endo_neg, exo_pos, and exo_neg) were combined into four .mzML input files for MAW.…”
Section: Suspect List Preparation and Metabolome Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the availability of different fragmentation techniques, collision-induced dissociation (CID) remains the primary method used in MS/MS. However, CID spectra exhibit limited reproducibility between instruments, making them unsuitable for the automated identification of analytes through spectra comparison [15,16]. As a result, the confident annotation of organic compounds in LC-MS untargeted studies using ESI-MS/MS remains a significant challenge, even with the development of advanced computational tools like molecular networks [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%