2019
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6supl2p3133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maturity dependent variation in composition and characteristics of potentially digestible tissues of leucena

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of cutting age on the production, chemical composition, degradation kinetics and anatomy of Leucena (Leucaena leucocephala). The experimental design was a completely randomized design with a factorial arrangement 2x4 (two types of tissues and four cutting ages) for the production data of dry matter and 3x4 (three degrees of degrees of digestion of tissues and four cutting ages). Observed effect (P < 0.05) for the total production of DM of Leucena in fun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the present crude protein content is far from the 22.67-29.17% recorded by Adekojo et al (2014). The variations in crude protein content of Leucaena leaf meal as reported by different researchers could be attributed to the nutritional constituents of the soil on which the plant was grown, age of cultivars and the processing methods deployed before proximate composition analysis of the leaf meal (Ayssiwede et al 2010;Adekojo et al 2014;Figueredo et al 2019). According to Adekojo et al (2014), variations in proximate compositions of Leucaena leaf meal depend on the different processing methods, namely air-drying; soaking in fresh water at room temperature for 36 hours; soaking in hot water for 24 hours and fermenting for 5 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the present crude protein content is far from the 22.67-29.17% recorded by Adekojo et al (2014). The variations in crude protein content of Leucaena leaf meal as reported by different researchers could be attributed to the nutritional constituents of the soil on which the plant was grown, age of cultivars and the processing methods deployed before proximate composition analysis of the leaf meal (Ayssiwede et al 2010;Adekojo et al 2014;Figueredo et al 2019). According to Adekojo et al (2014), variations in proximate compositions of Leucaena leaf meal depend on the different processing methods, namely air-drying; soaking in fresh water at room temperature for 36 hours; soaking in hot water for 24 hours and fermenting for 5 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its high palatability, a digestibility between 50% and 70% [ 30 , 31 ], and its good nutritional value (22%−28% protein), Leucaena forage can be a valid feedstuff both for ruminants (cattle, sheep, and goats) [ 32 , 33 ] and for non-ruminants (pigs, rabbits, chickens, fish). Figueredo et al [ 34 ] reported a change in the chemical composition of the Leucaena forage in relation to the age of the cut. In particular, between 30 and 90 days of age, they detected a significant increase in dry matter (18.78% vs. 45.47%) and a significant decrease in protein (22.90% vs. 12.31%) and ash (6.09% vs. 3.67%) but constant values of neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, hemicelluloses, cellulose, and lignin.…”
Section: Swot Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high protein and β-carotene content, which make Leucaena comparable to alfalfa fodder ( Table 2 ), is accompanied by an amino acid composition like that of soy meal and fishmeal [ 33 ], quite rich in essential amino acids such as isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, and histidine. Leucaena fodder can be an excellent source of calcium, phosphorus, and other minerals, depending on the mineral availability of the soil [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], but it is generally deficient in sodium [ 30 , 32 , 34 ]. Not much data is available on the non-structural carbohydrates present in the leaves; Kale [ 37 ] reports the following composition: 18.6% total carbohydrates, 1% starch, 2.8% total oligosaccharides, 4.2% reducing sugars, 1.2% sucrose, and 0.6% raffinose.…”
Section: Swot Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is composed of a few essential amino acids such as leucine, isoleucine, histidine and phenylalanine. The fodder is also a rich source of phosphorus, calcium and a number of other minerals [ 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], despite its lack of sodium [ 25 , 26 ]. A combination of total carbohydrates: 18.6%; starch: 1%; total oligosaccharides: 2.8%; reducing sugars: 4.2%; sucrose: 1.2% and raffinose: 0.6% has been reported by Kale in Akingbade [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%