2002
DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200210000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maturation of Brain Function Associated With Response Inhibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

47
382
2
9

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 491 publications
(440 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
47
382
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that this increasingly focal engagement of cognitive control areas reflects a strengthening of connections within the control network, and of its projections to other regions (a claim consistent with data on increased connectivity among cortical areas with development; Liston et al, 2006). Improved performance on cognitive control tasks between childhood and adulthood is accompanied by two different functional changes: Between childhood and adolescence, there appears to be an increase in activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Adelman et al, 2002;Casey et al, 2000;Durston et al, 2002;Luna et al, 2001;Tamm et al, 2002;), consistent with the synaptic pruning and myelination of this region at this time. The period between adolescence and adulthood, in contrast, appears to be one of fine-tuning (rather than one characterized by an overall increase or decrease in activation; Brown et al, 2005), presumably facilitated by the more extensive connectivity within and across brain areas (Crone et al, 2006;Luna et al, 2001).…”
Section: Functional Changes In the Cognitive Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It has been suggested that this increasingly focal engagement of cognitive control areas reflects a strengthening of connections within the control network, and of its projections to other regions (a claim consistent with data on increased connectivity among cortical areas with development; Liston et al, 2006). Improved performance on cognitive control tasks between childhood and adulthood is accompanied by two different functional changes: Between childhood and adolescence, there appears to be an increase in activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Adelman et al, 2002;Casey et al, 2000;Durston et al, 2002;Luna et al, 2001;Tamm et al, 2002;), consistent with the synaptic pruning and myelination of this region at this time. The period between adolescence and adulthood, in contrast, appears to be one of fine-tuning (rather than one characterized by an overall increase or decrease in activation; Brown et al, 2005), presumably facilitated by the more extensive connectivity within and across brain areas (Crone et al, 2006;Luna et al, 2001).…”
Section: Functional Changes In the Cognitive Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The go/no-go task (Anderson et al 2005;Schweinsburg et al 2004b) was designed to assess inhibitory processing by asking participants to withhold a response to an infrequently occurring stimulus. Previous studies have observed activation in dorsolateral prefrontal, inferior frontal, anterior cingulate, and posterior parietal regions among adolescents using this task (Anderson et al 2005;Schweinsburg et al 2004a) and similar inhibition paradigms (Adleman et al 2002;Luna et al 2001;Tamm et al 2002). Based on findings of response inhibition among teenagers and marijuana-using adults, we predicted that abstinent marijuanausing adolescents would demonstrate increased prefrontal and decreased cingulate response compared to non-using controls during inhibition trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The heteromodal nature of cognitive brain development is evident from studies of neurocognitive performance (6,7), functional imaging (functional MRI or positronemission tomography) (8)(9)(10), and electroencephalogram coherence studies (1,2,10). Prior imaging studies show regional nonlinear changes in gray matter (GM) density during childhood and adolescence with prepubertal increase followed by postpubertal loss (11)(12)(13)(14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%