2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8574(01)00089-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maturation of a constructed tidal marsh relative to two natural reference tidal marshes over 12 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 ), which represented a fraction of the total sediment volume sampled in all years. For analysis of species richness and associated indices, the initial sampling years were removed the data, as information available on samples did not allow for possible correction of data using other methods (e.g., rarefaction curves).…”
Section: Sampling Methodology: Benthic Invertebratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3 ), which represented a fraction of the total sediment volume sampled in all years. For analysis of species richness and associated indices, the initial sampling years were removed the data, as information available on samples did not allow for possible correction of data using other methods (e.g., rarefaction curves).…”
Section: Sampling Methodology: Benthic Invertebratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some exceptions: a restored marsh in southern California supported equivalent levels of macrofaunal densities, species richness, and diversity as that of the nearby reference marsh in 19 months, although species composition remained different [15]. A strong correlation appears to exist between time since restoration and many benthic parameters, with older marshes showing more structural similarities to natural marshes [3] [10] [11] [16]- [19]. Within 5 to 10 years, some marshes reached equivalence of invertebrate communities with natural marshes or even surpassed them in some parameters such as species diversity or density [2] [3] [11] [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though the general process for plant community succession in newly restored marshes is understood, the amount of time it takes for this process to fully restore marsh communities to those typical of natural marshes is less well known (Fell et al 1991). Differences between plant communities in removal and reference marshes have been detected several years (Darnell andSmith 2002, Morgan andShort 2002) and after many decades (Burd et al 1994, Havens et al 2002, Wolters et al 2005b, suggesting that plant communities are slow to reassemble.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%