2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maturation and persistence of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 memory B cell response

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
228
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
29
228
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that infecteds may or may not present with symptoms and that the removed pool accounts for individuals with negligible contribution to infection spread, including individuals that have either recovered with full immunity or died. Given that natural immunity may persist over several months [6][7][8][9] and that our simulations span a period of 6 months, we make the plausible assumption that individuals do not return to the susceptible pool once infected. For simplicity, the simulation scope is limited to two age groups, children in K-12 education spread over 1 to 3 child cohorts and adults over 18 years.…”
Section: Compartmental Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that infecteds may or may not present with symptoms and that the removed pool accounts for individuals with negligible contribution to infection spread, including individuals that have either recovered with full immunity or died. Given that natural immunity may persist over several months [6][7][8][9] and that our simulations span a period of 6 months, we make the plausible assumption that individuals do not return to the susceptible pool once infected. For simplicity, the simulation scope is limited to two age groups, children in K-12 education spread over 1 to 3 child cohorts and adults over 18 years.…”
Section: Compartmental Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no cut-off has been validated, and assessment of the immune status of all vaccine recipients constitutes an unrealistic scenario implying carrying out serological testing on a large scale and spending considerable logistical and financial resources. Since the ADE hypothesis is not supported to date by clinical trials results (including previously infected people), and since series of data seem to indicate that most individuals are protected at least until 3-6 months after a documented infection (49), providing the vaccine after this delay appears a wise option. The vaccine is then expected to act as a booster, helping to mount a faster immune response in case of further contact and reinforcing immune memory.…”
Section: Who Should Be Vaccinated?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duration of immunological memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 is unclear [203], but antigenspecific memory T and B cells are detectable in convalescence [403,404]. There is growing evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection generates antigen-driven long-lasting B cell memory that persists and matures for several months after SARS-CoV-2 infection and may provide long-term protection against systemic disease upon reinfection [405,406]. Thus, waning nAb titers in plasma several months post infection may be compensated by the persistent Bmem repertoire that remains at constant levels or even increases in numbers according to a recent study [407].…”
Section: B Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%