2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maturation and age in queen conch (Strombus gigas): Urgent need for changes in harvest criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For queen conch the density thresholds recommended by scientists and policy makers to support breeding is between 50 and 100 adult conch ha −1 (Stoner et al 2012a). Our ES survey expanded on both sides of the original RS survey within the ECLSP and included additional habitat that harbored high densities of breeding adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For queen conch the density thresholds recommended by scientists and policy makers to support breeding is between 50 and 100 adult conch ha −1 (Stoner et al 2012a). Our ES survey expanded on both sides of the original RS survey within the ECLSP and included additional habitat that harbored high densities of breeding adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, growth patterns and shell characteristics are influenced by the environment and are spatially and temporally variable. In The Bahamas, sexual maturity is first observed in conch with a shell lip thickness near 10 mm (Stoner et al 2012a), and 50% maturity occurs near 15 mm (Community Conch unpubl. data).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals were tagged across the size classes 'juvenile', 'subadult' and 'adult' in December 2009, June 2010and April 2011 (Table 1). Animals with syphonal length of <150 mm were considered juvenile, those >150 mm were considered subadult, and those with a well-developed shell lip were considered adult, following the classification of Peel & Aldana-Aranda (2012) and Stoner et al (2012). The size distribution of tagged animals reflects well the size distribution in the entire population (Peel & Aldana-Aranda 2012).…”
Section: Tagging and Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from each gonad for histological preparation. Samples were prepared and mounted on glass slides according to the steps described by Stoner et al (2012a). All samples underwent histological analysis and were inspected for stages of gametogenesis, percent cover of gametogenic tissue and given a reproductive classification following procedures adapted from Delgado et al (2004).…”
Section: Whales and Dolphinsmentioning
confidence: 99%