1959
DOI: 10.1080/10671188.1959.10613007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maturation Age of 55 Boys in the Little League World Series, 1957

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification criteria are similar to previous studies that used the difference between SA and CA to classify youth athletes in several sports into contrasting maturity categories (Krogman 1959;Rochelle et al 1961;Peñ a Reyes et al 1994;Malina et al 2004Malina et al , 2007a. The band of 91.0 year approximates standard deviations for SA within half-year CA groups in the Fels sample of boys 12Á16 years, 0.94Á1.26 years .…”
Section: Maturity Classificationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The classification criteria are similar to previous studies that used the difference between SA and CA to classify youth athletes in several sports into contrasting maturity categories (Krogman 1959;Rochelle et al 1961;Peñ a Reyes et al 1994;Malina et al 2004Malina et al , 2007a. The band of 91.0 year approximates standard deviations for SA within half-year CA groups in the Fels sample of boys 12Á16 years, 0.94Á1.26 years .…”
Section: Maturity Classificationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A year later, Rotch (78) proposed the use of "anatomic age", based on the radiographic assessment of the carpal bones, for grouping children in both school and sports. Commenting on the overrepresentation of early maturing boys competing in the 1957 Baseball Little League World Series, Krogman (47) suggested that assessments of maturation should be considered when determining player eligibility and evaluating athletic potential.…”
Section: Bio-banding: a History Of The Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garganta, Maia, Silva, and Natal (1993) showed significant differences in height and mass between national youth team players and regional youth soccer players in Portugal. Advanced physiological maturity was observed for many children participating in the Little League World Series by Hale (1956), who used pubic hair ratings, and by Krogman (1959), who estimated skeletal age. Data comparing the physical properties of dropouts and players disadvantaged by their relative age to the body indices of players profiting from a relative age advantage are completely lacking, however.…”
Section: Physical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One alternative to chronological age as the basis of the classification system is biological age: anthropometric measurements such as height, weight, or a height-weight ratio, or physiological measurements such as dental age or sexual maturity revealed by secondary traits like pubic hair may be used as criteria to determine age grouping. Skeletal age is another promising indicator of physiological maturity since it provides a continuous indication of growth until maturity (Krogman, 1959; cf. Baxter-Jones, 1995).…”
Section: Classification Systems Based On Biological Agementioning
confidence: 99%