2015
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1061708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system

Abstract: The SRTs for the German matrix test for listeners with normal hearing in different stationary noise conditions could well be predicted based on the acoustical properties of the speech and noise signals. Minimum assumptions were made about human speech processing already incorporated in a reference-free ordinary ASR system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a number of works have attempted to partly or fully predict intelligibility using data-driven methods. One approach in this direction has been to use an Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system to transcribe degraded sentences, using the error rate as a measure of intelligibility [48], [49]. Another data-driven approach has been to non-intrusively estimate the output of an intrusive SIP algorithm [50], [51], [52], [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a number of works have attempted to partly or fully predict intelligibility using data-driven methods. One approach in this direction has been to use an Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system to transcribe degraded sentences, using the error rate as a measure of intelligibility [48], [49]. Another data-driven approach has been to non-intrusively estimate the output of an intrusive SIP algorithm [50], [51], [52], [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-term spectrum of the ICRA5-250 noise was shaped according to the international long-term average speech spectrum (Wagener, Brand, and Kollmeier 2006). Previous studies showed that the long-term spectrum of the SSN derived from the Oldenburg sentence test and the spectrum of the ICRA1 noise (stationary noise with the same long-term spectrum as ICRA5-250) resulted in the same SRTs (Hochmuth et al 2015;Wagener and Brand 2005). We thus assume that any differences in SRT observed between SSN and ICRA5-250 cannot be explained on the basis of spectral differences between the two maskers.…”
Section: Speech Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LP and HP condition were generated by filtering the speech and noise signals using a 1024 th order FFT filter with cut-off frequencies of 1.5 and 1.65 kHz, respec-tively. The cut-off frequencies of the filters were based on dividing the speech signals in two parts of comparable importance, considering the SII band importance function for speech in noise (ANSI 1997;Hochmuth et al 2015). The sum of the SII octave band importance weights is 0.457 for frequencies 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz (roughly corresponding to the LP condition in this study) and 0.543 for frequencies 2, 4, and 8 kHz (roughly corresponding to the HP condition in this study).…”
Section: Speech Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
A framework for simulating auditory discrimination experiments, based on an approach from Sch€ adler, Warzybok, Hochmuth, and Kollmeier [(2015). Int.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%