1965
DOI: 10.1021/ac60226a023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix Rank Analysis of Spectral of Data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental spectra and their first derivatives were then used to evaluate the 2 x 2 Wronskian determinants of all possible combinations of the four solutions, namely [l, 21 [ l , 31 [ 1,4] ,4]. For the [ l , 21 combination, for example, the Wronskian is second derivatives.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental spectra and their first derivatives were then used to evaluate the 2 x 2 Wronskian determinants of all possible combinations of the four solutions, namely [l, 21 [ l , 31 [ 1,4] ,4]. For the [ l , 21 combination, for example, the Wronskian is second derivatives.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the number of ion aggregates formed in citrate-containing solutions, matrix rank analysis (MRA) was performed with the aid of the MRA program . The basis of MRA is that the rank of the so-called absorbance matrix equals the number of statistically independent absorbing species. , For data analysis, the 235–337 nm region was used, and the residual absorbance curves were plotted as a function of λ to visualize how many species are required to describe the UV spectra sufficiently. The number of absorbing species was gradually increased until the calculated residual absorbances randomly scattered within the [−0.005, 0.005] interval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increased availability of computers, the need to extract more information from instrumental techniques has been increasingly recognized (Fenwick, 1932;Gran, 1952;Feates & Ives, 1956;Sternberg, Stillo & others, 1960;Jones, Seshadri & others, 1963;Katakis, 1965;Fraser & Suzuki, 1966;Wernimont, 1967;Westerberg, 1969;Anderson, Gibb & Littlewood, 1970).…”
Section: I G I T a L F I L T E R I N Gmentioning
confidence: 99%