2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2004.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix permanent inequalities for approximating joint assignment matrices in tracking systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result suggests several special properties that might be conjectured to hold for some values n > 2 . The most tantalizing relates to the fact that the denominator of the coefficient is the permanent of G. In fact, the overall result represents the joint assignment matrix (JAM) [9] of G, which is the solution 3 to an important combinatorial problem arising in multiple-target tracking and related applications [32,33]. Evaluation of the JAM for a general n × n matrix is believed to be computationally intractable based on the #P-Hard complexity of evaluating the permanent of a matrix [6,9,10,22], so it should not be surprising that JAM-equivalence does not hold for n > 2.…”
Section: The Rga and Its Inversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests several special properties that might be conjectured to hold for some values n > 2 . The most tantalizing relates to the fact that the denominator of the coefficient is the permanent of G. In fact, the overall result represents the joint assignment matrix (JAM) [9] of G, which is the solution 3 to an important combinatorial problem arising in multiple-target tracking and related applications [32,33]. Evaluation of the JAM for a general n × n matrix is believed to be computationally intractable based on the #P-Hard complexity of evaluating the permanent of a matrix [6,9,10,22], so it should not be surprising that JAM-equivalence does not hold for n > 2.…”
Section: The Rga and Its Inversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stochastic approximation methods running in polynomial time [e.g. Jerrum et al, 2004, Kuck et al, 2019 and variational bounds [see Uhlmann, 2004, and the references therein] are also available. Given that (17) must be evaluated for nm 2 values of (i, k, l), and accounting for the computation of the matrices Press et al, 2007, Chap.…”
Section: Gaussian Mixture Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests several special properties that might be conjectured to hold for some values n > 2. The most tantalizing relates to the fact that the denominator of the coefficient is the permanent of G. In fact, the overall result represents the joint assignment matrix (JAM) [5] of G, which is the solution 3 to an important combinatorial problem arising in multiple-target tracking and related applications [27,28]. Evaluation of the JAM for a general n×n matrix is believed to be computationally intractable based on the #P-Hard complexity of evaluating the permanent of a matrix [5,3,17,6], so it should not be surprising that JAM-equivalence does not hold for n > 2.…”
Section: The Rga and Its Inversementioning
confidence: 99%