AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020
DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-1820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix methods for input-output analysis of 2D and 3D hypersonic flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ideal preconditioner is easy to calculate and provides a good approximation of the inverse and it is also computationally cheap to apply. Recently, it was noted in the boundary layer research community by [18,66] that without a good preconditioner, general iterative methods indeed perform very poorly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ideal preconditioner is easy to calculate and provides a good approximation of the inverse and it is also computationally cheap to apply. Recently, it was noted in the boundary layer research community by [18,66] that without a good preconditioner, general iterative methods indeed perform very poorly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a new technique referred to as resolvent or input/output analysis has been introduced that combines the linear receptivity and instability problem via optimization techniques, such as singular value decomposition (SVD), to determine inflow disturbances that lead to maximal amplification [12]. These global analyses have been historically tractable for simple geometries at low-speeds [13], but their extension to high-speed flows have gained recent attention [14,15]. While promising results have been shown, their application to practical, in-flight geometries would involve complex algorithms and large-scale computing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%