2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10958-016-2734-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix Factorization for Solutions of the Yang–Baxter Equation

Abstract: We study solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation on a tensor product of an arbitrary finitedimensional and an arbitrary infinite-dimensional representations of the rank one symmetry algebra. We consider the cases of the Lie algebra sℓ 2 , the modular double (trigonometric deformation) and the Sklyanin algebra (elliptic deformation). The solutions are matrices with operator entries. The matrix elements are differential operators in the case of sℓ 2 , finite-difference operators with trigonometric coefficients in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general formula for the rational sl 2 R-matrix in the case of arbitrary spin, written as a function of the Casimir invariant, was obtained as early as in [14] (it is nicely reviewed in the lectures [7]). There is also a representation for the R-matrix in coherent state basis [23], where the R-matrix acts in a tensor product of two finite-dimensional representations, and another one, where the action is via a matrix-valued differential operator in the tensor product of a finite-dimensional representation and a generic Verma module [4]. However these expressions are not explicit enough to be compared with ours.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general formula for the rational sl 2 R-matrix in the case of arbitrary spin, written as a function of the Casimir invariant, was obtained as early as in [14] (it is nicely reviewed in the lectures [7]). There is also a representation for the R-matrix in coherent state basis [23], where the R-matrix acts in a tensor product of two finite-dimensional representations, and another one, where the action is via a matrix-valued differential operator in the tensor product of a finite-dimensional representation and a generic Verma module [4]. However these expressions are not explicit enough to be compared with ours.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%