2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.076010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix element method at NLO for (anti-) kt -jet algorithms

Abstract: In this article, we present a method to calculate a posteriori event weights at nextto-leading-order (NLO) QCD accuracy for a given jet event defined by the (anti-)k t algorithm relying on the conventional 2 → 1 recombination. This is an important extension compared to existing Monte-Carlo tools which generate jet events together with the corresponding weight but do not allow one to calculate the weight for a given event. The method can be used to generate unweighted events distributed according to the fixed-o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would also allow us to directly compare first-principles QCD predictions with modern LHC measurements. In addition, our fast inversion might help with advanced statistical techniques like the matrix element method [29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would also allow us to directly compare first-principles QCD predictions with modern LHC measurements. In addition, our fast inversion might help with advanced statistical techniques like the matrix element method [29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses machine learning to approximate the full likelihood fully taking into account parton shower as well as detector effects, which are only approximated in similar approaches like the matrix element method (see e.g. [36,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]) or the optimal observable approach [70][71][72].…”
Section: Jhep03(2022)017mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the conventions of our GAN analysis and in analogy to Eqs. (6) to (8) we define the network input as a vector of hard process information x p ∈ R D p and the output at detector level via the vector…”
Section: Naive Innmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best way to compare two hypotheses is the log-likelihood ratio based on new physics and Standard Model predictions for the hard process. Using this ratio in the analysis is the idea behind the matrix element method [2][3][4][5][6][7], but usually this information is not available [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%