2016
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2015.2465899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix-Based Discriminant Subspace Ensemble for Hyperspectral Image Spatial–Spectral Feature Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to these, graph-based methods [5], extreme learning machine [6], sparse representation-based classifier [7], and many other methods have been further employed to promote the performance of hyperspectral image classification. Nevertheless, it is difficult to distinguish different land-cover categories accurately by only using the spectral information [8]. With the observation that spatially neighboring pixels usually carry correlated information within a smooth spatial domain, many researchers have resorted to spectral-spatial classification methods and several models have been proposed to exploit such local continuity [9], [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these, graph-based methods [5], extreme learning machine [6], sparse representation-based classifier [7], and many other methods have been further employed to promote the performance of hyperspectral image classification. Nevertheless, it is difficult to distinguish different land-cover categories accurately by only using the spectral information [8]. With the observation that spatially neighboring pixels usually carry correlated information within a smooth spatial domain, many researchers have resorted to spectral-spatial classification methods and several models have been proposed to exploit such local continuity [9], [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the proposed Bi-CLSTM model with several FE methods, including regularized local discriminant embedding (RLDE) [50], matrix-based discriminant analysis (MDA) [3], 2D-CNN, 3D-CNN, LSTM [49], and CNN+LSTM. We train DL models on a single TITAN X GPU and implement them in TensorFlow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Indian Pines and KSC datasets, we randomly select 10% pixels from each class as the training set, and use the remaining pixels as the testing set. The same as the experiments in [3,49], we randomly choose 3921 pixels as the training set and the rest of pixels as the testing set for the Pavia University dataset. The detailed numbers of training and testing samples are listed from Tables 1-3.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The final classification is achieved by using a support vector machine classifier. Many other spectral and spatial joint features [18][19][20][21][22], such as 3D wavelet [18], spatial and spectral kernel [19], matrix-based discriminant subspace analysis [20], etc. are used for classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%