1989
DOI: 10.1137/0610036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrices, Digraphs, and Determinants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof uses the following theorem, stated for tree graphs in [9] and for general digraphs in [11], which we restate here for digraphs D(W ) with tridiagonal W . …”
Section: Let D(a(i)) Be the Associated Digraph Obtained By Deletingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof uses the following theorem, stated for tree graphs in [9] and for general digraphs in [11], which we restate here for digraphs D(W ) with tridiagonal W . …”
Section: Let D(a(i)) Be the Associated Digraph Obtained By Deletingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse of the Gaudin-matrix can be expressed in terms of its principal minors and sequences of its matrix elements [11,62] by the formula as follows:…”
Section: Jhep03(2018)047mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of the weighted adjacency matrix W to describe the walks on a graph goes back to the 60's. In [11,18], the spectral properties of a graph are investigated via the determinant and characteristic polynomial of W. Digraphs also provide a useful tool to compute the determinant and minors of sparse matrices, as discussed in [16]. For general results on spectral graph theory, we refer to [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%