2017
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731116001786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain

Abstract: We tested the hypothesis that mating strategies with genomic information realise lower rates of inbreeding (∆F) than with pedigree information without compromising rates of genetic gain (∆G). We used stochastic simulation to compare ∆F and ∆G realised by two mating strategies with pedigree and genomic information in five breeding schemes. The two mating strategies were minimum-coancestry mating (MC) and minimising the covariance between ancestral genetic contributions (MCAC). We also simulated random mating (R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the introduction of genomic selection has led to increased inbreeding rates and loss of genetic variance in cattle populations [ 99 , 100 ]. However, it has been proven that genomic breeding can outperform traditional methods in respect to maintenance of genetic variance and effective population size when applied correctly [ 101 , 102 , 103 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the introduction of genomic selection has led to increased inbreeding rates and loss of genetic variance in cattle populations [ 99 , 100 ]. However, it has been proven that genomic breeding can outperform traditional methods in respect to maintenance of genetic variance and effective population size when applied correctly [ 101 , 102 , 103 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the calculation of the inbreeding coefficient, time step was translated to its corresponding generation. The rate of inbreeding per generation [ 28 ] for a replicate was computed as , where is the slope of the linear regression of on generation corresponding to time steps 31 to 40.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These IBD markers are assigned unique alleles to each base plant, but not involved in selection. Within each locus of a descendant, each IBD marker allele could be traced directly back to the base plants from which it was derived (Liu et al, 2017). True inbreeding of each individual, which measures the level of inbreeding of the whole genome, is calculated using these IBD markers as the proportion of IBD markers that are identical by descent within an individual.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%