1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1991.tb12116.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematics and Science: A Shared Learning Cycle and a Common Learning Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is built on aspects of both constructivist and social constructivist thinking, and provides greater insights than earlier discussions of a preliminary Piagetian-based version (Appleton, 1993a). It focuses on the learner and his or her responses, rather than teaching steps common to models such as those based on the Science Curriculum Improvement Study learning cycle (Francis, Hill, & Redden, 1991). By focusing on the learner, it provides preknowledge for teachers about how students might arrive at solutions to science problems during lessons, and therefore potentially provides indications about appropriate teaching strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is built on aspects of both constructivist and social constructivist thinking, and provides greater insights than earlier discussions of a preliminary Piagetian-based version (Appleton, 1993a). It focuses on the learner and his or her responses, rather than teaching steps common to models such as those based on the Science Curriculum Improvement Study learning cycle (Francis, Hill, & Redden, 1991). By focusing on the learner, it provides preknowledge for teachers about how students might arrive at solutions to science problems during lessons, and therefore potentially provides indications about appropriate teaching strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After Jurascheck (1983) argued that the Atkin and Karplus learning cycle could also make a contribution to math education, researchers applied the learning cycle to math instruction and found that student understanding and achievement in mathematics was increased (e.g., Francis et al, 1991;Stephen, 1984). Thus, researchers concluded that the guided discovery learning cycle can be used to design effective science and math instruction.…”
Section: Discovery Learning Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning cycle continues to be an integral component of many teaching practices and research endeavors. Recent publications indicate the learning cycle is an effective teaching approach that enhances student outcomes (Barman, 1993;Blank, 2000;Cavallo & Laubach, 2001;Dwyer & Lopez, 2001;Gang, 1995;Jinkins, 2002;Lavoie, 1999;Marek & Methven, 1991;Musheno & Lawson, 1999;Norman, 1992;Norman & Caseau, 1995;Odom & Kelly, 2001) and teacher behaviors (Barman, 1992;Barman, 1993;Barman & Shedd, 1992;Francis, Hill, & Redden, 1991;Glasson & Lalik, 1993;Jinkins, 2001;Marek, Eubanks, & Gallaher, 1990;Marek & Methven, 1991;Odom & Settlage, 1996;Rosenthal, 1993;Settlage, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%