2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2496(03)00063-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical tools for hazard function analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, estimates of momentary hazard rates are often unreliable, with local irregularities amplified especially as response frequencies diminish toward the lower tail of the survivor function (see Cechile, 2003;Luce, 1986;Houpt & Townsend, 2012;Van Zandt, 2000). The integrated, H(t), functions can bypass aspects of this estimation problem (see Houpt & Townsend, 2012;Wenger & Gibson, 2004).…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, estimates of momentary hazard rates are often unreliable, with local irregularities amplified especially as response frequencies diminish toward the lower tail of the survivor function (see Cechile, 2003;Luce, 1986;Houpt & Townsend, 2012;Van Zandt, 2000). The integrated, H(t), functions can bypass aspects of this estimation problem (see Houpt & Townsend, 2012;Wenger & Gibson, 2004).…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hazard function has been employed since then frequently as a labor-static design (not to exclude the possibility that a participant might tire or warm up during a session, but the experimenter is not so manipulating the task). In addition, certain powerful stochastic methods have recently been enlisted that considerably enhance the utility and statistical sensitivity of hazard function analyses with psychological data (Chechile, 2003;Wenger & Gibson, 2004).…”
Section: Measures Of Capacity and Their Interrelationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have described ways that the hazard function can be used to identify cognitive processing properties (Ashby, 1982;Chechile, 2003;Townsend & Ashby, 1983;Van Zandt & Ratcliff, 1995). Systems factorial technology (SFT), developed by Townsend and colleagues, uses a number of ''functionals'' based on the cdf F (t|θ) and the survivor function S(t|θ) to determine different characteristics of multichannel cognitive processing systems (Houpt & Townsend, 2010Schweickert, Fisher, & Sung, 2012;Townsend & Nozawa, 1995;Townsend & Wenger, 2004).…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%