1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00324.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical shape matching as a tool in tooth wear assessment – development and conduct

Abstract: The quantitative assessment of restoration and tooth wear usually requires fixed reference points from which measurements are made. In longitudinal patient follow-up the loss or erosion of such points may preclude measurement and an alternative approach is to seek regions of coincidence and conflict in digital models of before and after wear surfaces, with a continuous refinement of the parameters of the coordinate transformations, until the closest correspondence between them is found. A computer program has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resultant maps may be compared using a surface matching and difference detection algorithm. This technique provides readings with good accuracy and reproducibility [60][61][62] [ [43][44][45]. Erosions of 50 tJm magnitude occurring over a 9 month period were recorded to a precision of about ±15 tJm [59] [42].…”
Section: Surface Profilometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant maps may be compared using a surface matching and difference detection algorithm. This technique provides readings with good accuracy and reproducibility [60][61][62] [ [43][44][45]. Erosions of 50 tJm magnitude occurring over a 9 month period were recorded to a precision of about ±15 tJm [59] [42].…”
Section: Surface Profilometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique of least squares surface matching has been widely applied for registration of photogrammetrically-derived DEMs in the context of a number of applications (e.g. Mitchell and Chadwick, 1998;Mills et al, 2005). This is an automated technique which minimises differences between overlapping DEMs by establishing pointto-point or point-to-surface correspondences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other areas, such as tooth wear measurements (Zhou and Zheng, 2008;Pintado MR et al, 2000;Mitchell and Chadwick, 1998) this has not been the case. There have been some 640 papers published in tooth wear measurement over the period of 1960 to 2007, and the measurements within these papers are wide ranging using a clinical tooth wear index, a modified index, reduced depth of tooth surface in the laboratory, reduced volume and changes in percentage of the area or volume.…”
Section: Standards Around the Areamentioning
confidence: 99%