2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
288
3
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 463 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
288
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Falling is a dynamic event involving high strain rates. Material properties of bone tissue are not only volume fraction dependent and anisotropic (Helgason et al, 2008;Morgan et al, 2003), but are also visco-elastic and visco-plastic (i.e. stiffer and stronger, but more brittle) under impact-compared to quasi-static loading conditions (Carter and Hayes, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Falling is a dynamic event involving high strain rates. Material properties of bone tissue are not only volume fraction dependent and anisotropic (Helgason et al, 2008;Morgan et al, 2003), but are also visco-elastic and visco-plastic (i.e. stiffer and stronger, but more brittle) under impact-compared to quasi-static loading conditions (Carter and Hayes, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, such models neglect mass-related effects and utilize material models that are calibrated based on low strain rate experimental testing of small bone cores (Helgason et al, 2008). These models are validated by means of quasi-static destructive testing of whole bones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element (FE) models have been proposed as an automatic and mechanistic method to assess bone strength and fracture risk in individuals [1]- [3]. However, there is no consensus about the optimal constitutive model and bone strength criterion to be implemented in such FE models [4]- [7]. This is because bone is a complex composite material, with properties that among other things change with time-and length-scale [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HU values are considered as temperatures, in order to simulate the inhomogeneous bone material properties in vivo by a linear-elastic temperature-dependent material model [5]. Correlations between HU and Young's modulus or bone mineral density and Young's modulus can be found in the literature [6]. The relationship between HU and bone mineral density can be determined through a bone mineral density phantom, which should be CT-scanned together with the interesting bone structure [4].…”
Section: Preparation Of the Fe-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%