2006
DOI: 10.1080/13598130601121409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical precocity in young children: a neo‐Piagetian perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Epistemological constructivism brought rigor to our understanding of the processes of “becoming.” Studying the “what” and “how” of children’s thinking—the nature of thinking in different domains, how that thinking is consolidated, integrated, and applied, and how it develops in complexity over time—has led to better understanding of the conceptual underpinnings of thought and the influences that support different developmental trajectories (e.g., McKeough, Genereux, & Jeary, 2006 ; Okamoto, Curtis, Jabagchourian, & Weckbacher, 2006 ; Porath, 2006a , 2009 ). This perspective captures the emergent nature of giftedness ( Porath, 2006b )—an understanding central to moving us more firmly into a focus on “becoming.”…”
Section: Modern Onset: the Emergence Of The Identification Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epistemological constructivism brought rigor to our understanding of the processes of “becoming.” Studying the “what” and “how” of children’s thinking—the nature of thinking in different domains, how that thinking is consolidated, integrated, and applied, and how it develops in complexity over time—has led to better understanding of the conceptual underpinnings of thought and the influences that support different developmental trajectories (e.g., McKeough, Genereux, & Jeary, 2006 ; Okamoto, Curtis, Jabagchourian, & Weckbacher, 2006 ; Porath, 2006a , 2009 ). This perspective captures the emergent nature of giftedness ( Porath, 2006b )—an understanding central to moving us more firmly into a focus on “becoming.”…”
Section: Modern Onset: the Emergence Of The Identification Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robust findings from longitudinal studies of mathematically gifted children indicate high levels of academic success and career attainment for students identified in middle school, particularly in areas of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM; Benbow, 2012; Wai, Lubinski, Benbow, & Steiger, 2010). Studies of young children indicate that mathematical precocity is unrelated to working memory (Okamoto, Curtis, Jabagchourian, & Weckbacher, 2006) or creativity (Baran, Erdogan, & Cakmak, 2011). These children did exhibit higher levels of numerical conceptual structure (Okamoto et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of young children indicate that mathematical precocity is unrelated to working memory (Okamoto, Curtis, Jabagchourian, & Weckbacher, 2006) or creativity (Baran, Erdogan, & Cakmak, 2011). These children did exhibit higher levels of numerical conceptual structure (Okamoto et al, 2006). Observable behaviors of mathematically gifted young children included choosing to play or work with numbers, finding patterns, planning steps to solve problems, grouping objects, assembling puzzles, and grouping/regrouping objects in many ways (Lapp & St. John, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%