2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.11.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical models of martensitic microstructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, the optical micrographs of habit planes, macrotwins, or more complex microstructures in this alloy have been used several times to confirm the theoretical predictions of the mathematical theory of martensitic microstructures [10,11], which explains the formation of the observed microstructures by means of energy minimization and kinematic compatibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this sense, the optical micrographs of habit planes, macrotwins, or more complex microstructures in this alloy have been used several times to confirm the theoretical predictions of the mathematical theory of martensitic microstructures [10,11], which explains the formation of the observed microstructures by means of energy minimization and kinematic compatibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Solid-solid phase transitions are a classical model problem in the variational study of pattern formation in solids, both in the context of the theory of relaxation and in the study of singularly perturbed problems. Their study has led on the one side to many important abstract developments in the calculus of variations, on the other side to a mathematical explanation of the physical behavior of shape-memory alloys and other materials with peculiar properties [4,5,9,47,3,41,34]. The basic model is a vectorial, nonconvex variational problem, where the integrand depends on the gradient of the deformation field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that (6) implies that detν x = det U 1 for any zero-energy microstructure. (See [9] for a description of gradient Young measures in the context of the nonlinear elasticity model for martensite.) In the case of cubic symmetry, and the absence of boundary conditions on ∂Ω, there always exist such zero-energy microstructures.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Polycrystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%