2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01546-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical models for thermionic emission current density of graphene emitter

Abstract: In this study, five mathematical models were fitted in the absence of space charge with experimental data to find a more appropriate model and predict the emission current density of the graphene-based thermionic energy converter accurately. Modified Richardson Dushman model (MRDE) shows that TEC's electron emission depends on temperature, Fermi energy, work function, and coefficient of thermal expansion. Lowest Least square value of $$S=\sum {\left({J}_{th}-{J}_{exp}\right)}^{2}=0.0002 \,\text{A}^{2}/\text{m}… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 4) obtained for a sufficient number of the wave vector values. It is also worth paying attention to the inapplicability of three-dimensional electron emission models to twodimensional materials [47] and to the recent appearance of a modified Richardson-Dushman equation for two-dimensional materials, in particular, graphene and carbon nanotubes [48,49]. Deviations from the Richardson-Dushman formula are also possible as a result of non-equilibrium effects [50].…”
Section: Experimental Methods For Determining the Work Function And T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 4) obtained for a sufficient number of the wave vector values. It is also worth paying attention to the inapplicability of three-dimensional electron emission models to twodimensional materials [47] and to the recent appearance of a modified Richardson-Dushman equation for two-dimensional materials, in particular, graphene and carbon nanotubes [48,49]. Deviations from the Richardson-Dushman formula are also possible as a result of non-equilibrium effects [50].…”
Section: Experimental Methods For Determining the Work Function And T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And by extension it is known as a periodic function of an atomic number [120] . Its dependence on physical factors such as temperature, surface dipole, doping, and electric field cannot be underestimated as investigated by the authors of the twentieth century [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] that image potential contributes to the work function of materials and this work function depends on temperature [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] . Also, experimental and theoretical findings revealed that work function is dependent on electronic heat capacity [17] , thermal expansion of the lattice [17] , Young's modulus [17] , [18] , [19] , friction [20] , adhesion [21] surface energy [22] , fracture toughness [19] , [20] , [23] , corrosion [15] , [21] , [24] , and yield strength and hardness [26] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%