2006
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2006.65-05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Models and the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Abstract: The use of mathematical models in the experimental analysis of behavior has increased over the years, and they offer several advantages. Mathematical models require theorists to be precise and unambiguous, often allowing comparisons of competing theories that sound similar when stated in words. Sometimes different mathematical models may make equally accurate predictions for a large body of data. In such cases, it is important to find and investigate situations for which the competing models make different pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
84
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…magnitude), a change in the rate of delay discounting is neither a necessary nor a sufficent condition for a shift of choice in the direction of 'impulsiveness' or 'self-control'. This is exemplified by the effects of AcbC and OPFC lesions discussed above, which, depending on the delays and sizes of the reinforcers, may have similar or opposite effects on choice behaviour, although, according to the present analysis, both lesions may have a facilitatory effect on the rate of delay discounting (see Mazur 2006;Bradshaw et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…magnitude), a change in the rate of delay discounting is neither a necessary nor a sufficent condition for a shift of choice in the direction of 'impulsiveness' or 'self-control'. This is exemplified by the effects of AcbC and OPFC lesions discussed above, which, depending on the delays and sizes of the reinforcers, may have similar or opposite effects on choice behaviour, although, according to the present analysis, both lesions may have a facilitatory effect on the rate of delay discounting (see Mazur 2006;Bradshaw et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…magnitude, manifested in Q) is also affected. Quantitative analysis based on a family of indifference points enabled an effect of both lesions on delay discounting to be revealed (see Mazur 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and 2) quantifies what practitioners already know: The arrangement of discrepancies between what a client usually does (O i /O c ) and what a client is required to do during intervention (I/C) will result in a change in behavior. Although intuitive in its narrative form, the disequilibrium model goes further in that it formalizes that intuition by quantifying it and providing a means to predict a likely result (see Critchfield &Reed, 2009 andMazur, 2006, for the benefits of quantification over narration). In formalizing reinforcement and punishment, the disequilibrium model specifies some of the necessary conditions that factor into the success of a particular intervention: A contingency that produces a response deficit will increase behavior whereas a contingency that produces a response excess will decrease behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical models are of various forms such as deterministic, stochastic, fuzzy, and uncertain forms, Mazur [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%