2019
DOI: 10.12720/jcm.14.8.727-738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Modeling of the Scalable LISP-deployed Software-Defined Wireless Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol messages and sizes of LISP, IP mobility, and OpenFlow used in this analysis are listed in Table II. The mathematical model and all values for calculating the operational cost were referenced from [29] and for calculating handover delay were referenced from [30]. However, as the references did not consider the SFC environment, this study additionally assumed that a service chain including the , i.e., number of services, in the ℎ − , i.e., number of xTRs in the endto-end path, was configured.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The protocol messages and sizes of LISP, IP mobility, and OpenFlow used in this analysis are listed in Table II. The mathematical model and all values for calculating the operational cost were referenced from [29] and for calculating handover delay were referenced from [30]. However, as the references did not consider the SFC environment, this study additionally assumed that a service chain including the , i.e., number of services, in the ℎ − , i.e., number of xTRs in the endto-end path, was configured.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], the total operating cost for the mobile terminal in the LISP-based environment is defined as the sum of the location update cost , map discovery cost , and packet delivery cost . However, in this analysis, it is difficult to accurately compare other costs because the packet delivery cost may be significantly larger than other costs with the increase in the service chain path.…”
Section: A Operation Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mobile-to-mobile scenario analysis, the end-to-end path was calculated as approximately double that of h_(S-opt) and h_(S-nonopt). The number of hops for each route is assumed, as shown in Table 1 [26]. Based on the reference architecture, we compared the operational costs of our proposal with LISP-MN [25], LISP-FMC [12], and LISP-PACAO [13].…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because other approaches consider only the service migration scenario, but not the scenario with equivalent services running in a distributed manner, we consider only the operational cost related to the LISP mapping system for the network configuration, and not the costs related to the service migration or optimal service selection process. The mathematical model and all values for calculating the operational cost are referenced from [26]. For the evaluation of SDN-MM, we assume that the Edge Switch (ES) is in position the same as xTR, and SDN Controller as LISP-MS. where denotes the average velocity of the MN and denotes the radius of the circular area of a LISP site.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%