2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-017-0371-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Modeling of the Effects of Tumor Heterogeneity on the Efficiency of Radiation Treatment Schedule

Abstract: Radiotherapy uses high doses of energy to eradicate cancer cells and control tumors. Various treatment schedules have been developed and tried in clinical trials, yet significant obstacles remain to improving the radiotherapy fractionation. Genetic and non-genetic cellular diversity within tumors can lead to different radiosensitivity among cancer cells that can affect radiation treatment outcome. We propose a minimal mathematical model to study the effect of tumor heterogeneity and repair in different radiati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies suggest that PDT is most likely successful in tumors with high surface-to-volume ratios, and that PDT is unlikely to provide control in fast proliferating deep tumor tissues, which supports previous model results for low-penetrating red-light PDT [86]. As PDT and radiation therapy share similar biological responses and routine involvement of medical physics, modeling approaches for radiotherapy response may be readily translatable to identify optimal PDT protocols [59, 61, 63, 8793]. In this Perspective, we suggest integrated mathematical oncology as a computational platform for developing quantitative models and simulations of PDT dosimetry to optimize local tumor control, tumor-focused drug release, spatiotemporal dynamics, and photodynamic priming of systemic modes of therapy.…”
Section: Integrated Mathematical Oncologysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These studies suggest that PDT is most likely successful in tumors with high surface-to-volume ratios, and that PDT is unlikely to provide control in fast proliferating deep tumor tissues, which supports previous model results for low-penetrating red-light PDT [86]. As PDT and radiation therapy share similar biological responses and routine involvement of medical physics, modeling approaches for radiotherapy response may be readily translatable to identify optimal PDT protocols [59, 61, 63, 8793]. In this Perspective, we suggest integrated mathematical oncology as a computational platform for developing quantitative models and simulations of PDT dosimetry to optimize local tumor control, tumor-focused drug release, spatiotemporal dynamics, and photodynamic priming of systemic modes of therapy.…”
Section: Integrated Mathematical Oncologysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These models neglect tissue spatial structure and focus on the dynamics of the involved cell populations. They can address a variety of phenomena such as tumor clonal heterogeneity [2022], tumor-host cell interactions [2325] and response to therapy [2629].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooke et al demonstrated that intratumor heterogeneity was associated with poor chemoradiotherapy response in cervical cancer 4 . Also, tumor heterogeneity could result in radio‐resistance of patients 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Also, tumor heterogeneity could result in radio-resistance of patients. 5 Intratumor heterogeneity leads to startling differences in many morphological and physiological features, such as cell proliferative and angiogenic potential. 6 Tumor heterogeneity refers to diversity of tumor cells, requiring detection methods in single-cell level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%