1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19960120)49:2<172::aid-bit6>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical modeling of mixed-culture biofilms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
107
0
15

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
107
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Also mathematical models for biofilms have been developed for many years, originally primarily in the engineering literature [29,30]. They are more complex than models of suspended growth, because they must account for the spatial aspects of biofilms, most notably the inhomogeneous distribution of bacteria and substrates across the depth of a biofilm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also mathematical models for biofilms have been developed for many years, originally primarily in the engineering literature [29,30]. They are more complex than models of suspended growth, because they must account for the spatial aspects of biofilms, most notably the inhomogeneous distribution of bacteria and substrates across the depth of a biofilm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For biomass fractions quantification, the granules were crushed 157 using a mortar and a pestle and then, FISH procedure was followed. The quantification 158 was performed following a modification of the procedure described in Jubany et al airlift reactor performance based on Wanner and Reichert (1996) and implemented in 168 the software package AQUASIM v.2.1d (Reichert, 1998). 169 170…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While early mathematical models of biofilm implicitly assumed that it forms a uniform, smooth layer (e.g. [2][3][4][5]), improved microscopic techniques in recent decades have revealed a rich diversity of biofilm structure varying from smooth flat biofilm to forms described as towers, mushrooms, streamers, pores and channels (e.g. [6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%