2016
DOI: 10.1515/cppm-2015-0051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Modeling and Investigation on the Temperature and Pressure Dependency of Permeation and Membrane Separation Performance for Natural gas Treatment

Abstract: Due to special features, modules comprising asymmetric hollow fiber membranes are widely used in various industrial gas separation processes. Accordingly, numerous mathematical models have been proposed for predicting and analyzing the performance. However, majority of the proposed models for this purpose assume that membrane permeance remains constant upon changes in temperature and pressure. In this study, a mathematical model is proposed by taking into account non-ideal effects including changes in pressure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For removal carbon dioxide (CO2), glassy polymeric membranes are often preferred over rubbery polymeric membranes because of their higher CO2/CH4 or CO2/N2 selectivity. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Although some types of glassy membranes have a good performance in CO2 separation, the performance of these membranes can be hindered by plasticization phenomenon. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Therefore, CO2 permeability increases with the feed pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For removal carbon dioxide (CO2), glassy polymeric membranes are often preferred over rubbery polymeric membranes because of their higher CO2/CH4 or CO2/N2 selectivity. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Although some types of glassy membranes have a good performance in CO2 separation, the performance of these membranes can be hindered by plasticization phenomenon. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Therefore, CO2 permeability increases with the feed pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the disadvantage and limitations of these methods are needing addition of chemicals, production of sludge, difficulty in reusing extracted heavy metal and high costs among others [5,6,9,10]. On the other hand, since their evolution, membrane separation processes have offered advantages such as low energy consumption, continuous operation, modular design, high efficiency, minimal labor requirements, selective removal of pollutants, low cost, physical separation of contaminants as well as easy operations and maintenance [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Accordingly, application of membranes for effective treatment of electroplating wastewater has attracted many researchers and membranologists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%