2018
DOI: 10.3390/met8100756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Model for Prediction and Optimization of Weld Bead Geometry in All-Position Automatic Welding of Pipes

Abstract: In this study all-position automatic tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding was exploited to enhance quality and efficiency in the welding of copper-nickel alloy pipes. The mathematical models of all-position automatic TIG weld bead shapes were conducted by the response surface method (RSM) on the foundation of central composition design (CCD). The statistical models were verified for their significance and adequacy by analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition, the influences of welding peak current, welding velocit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 , Table 5 , Table 6 , Table 7 and Table 8 represent the ANOVA analysis of the recorded machine torque, PZ temperature, surface roughness of the processed zone, hardness values, and UTS mathematical model. The values of “Prob > F” less than 0.0500 indicate mathematical model terms are significant, and a value greater than 0.1000 indicate the model terms are not significant [ 37 ]. Table 4 , Table 5 , Table 6 , Table 7 and Table 8 show the result of ANOVA for the recorded machine torque model, PZ temperature model, surface roughness in processing paths, hardness value, and the UTS models, respectively, and the F-values of the mathematical models are 29.82, 349.14, 93.55, 307.55, and 650.71.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 , Table 5 , Table 6 , Table 7 and Table 8 represent the ANOVA analysis of the recorded machine torque, PZ temperature, surface roughness of the processed zone, hardness values, and UTS mathematical model. The values of “Prob > F” less than 0.0500 indicate mathematical model terms are significant, and a value greater than 0.1000 indicate the model terms are not significant [ 37 ]. Table 4 , Table 5 , Table 6 , Table 7 and Table 8 show the result of ANOVA for the recorded machine torque model, PZ temperature model, surface roughness in processing paths, hardness value, and the UTS models, respectively, and the F-values of the mathematical models are 29.82, 349.14, 93.55, 307.55, and 650.71.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSM is a widely used modelling technique which is used to develop a mathematical relationship between the machining variables and output responses [40,41]. RSM consists of both modelling and statistic approaches.…”
Section: Design Matrix As Per the Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%