Handbook of Polymer Reaction Engineering 2005
DOI: 10.1002/9783527619870.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Methods

Abstract: IntroductionIn this chapter some mathematical methods to solve kinetic modeling problems are explained. A very sound basis for this was already laid many years ago by Flory [1]. Here, we want to present modern mathematical tools that have recently been developed through the use of computers. The focus is on the link between kinetic rate data and reactor type on one hand, and distributive properties -in one or more dimensions -on the other. These distributive or microstructural properties are concerned not only… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the distribution used there may not be the most appropriate one for the kinetic growth of the polymer chains. Iedema and Kolhapure [ 68 ] compared the solution of PBE by the Galerkin h – p finite element method (FEM) and the solution of the moment equations using the Hulburt and Katz closure for a polymerization with chain transfer to polymer (LCB) in a continuous stirred‐tank reactor (CSTR), the results are shown in Figure 4A. [ 69 ] Increasing the value of the transfer to polymer rate constant ( k tp ) the discrepancy between the solutions becomes more important.…”
Section: Moment Closurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the distribution used there may not be the most appropriate one for the kinetic growth of the polymer chains. Iedema and Kolhapure [ 68 ] compared the solution of PBE by the Galerkin h – p finite element method (FEM) and the solution of the moment equations using the Hulburt and Katz closure for a polymerization with chain transfer to polymer (LCB) in a continuous stirred‐tank reactor (CSTR), the results are shown in Figure 4A. [ 69 ] Increasing the value of the transfer to polymer rate constant ( k tp ) the discrepancy between the solutions becomes more important.…”
Section: Moment Closurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the distribution used there may not be the most appropriate one for the kinetic growth of the polymer chains. Iedema and Kolhapure [68] compared the solution of PBE by the Galerkin hp finite element method (FEM) and the F I G U R E 4 (A) Comparison between the method of moments (MoM) solution (with closure method) and the solution of the population balance equations (PBE) (without closure method). Reproduced with permission from Iedema and Kolhapure [69] Copyright © 2008 John Wiley and Sons.…”
Section: Heterophase Polymerization Processes (Hpp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficient tools have been developed describing macromolecular properties in terms of numbers of monomer units, branches, functional groups, etc. ( Dhooge et al, 2016;Iedema and Kolhapure, 2008;Mastan et al, 2015;Mueller et al, 2011;Tobita and Hamielec, 20 0 0 ). A class of polymerization systems exists, however, with more than usually complex chemistry, for which we nevertheless desire to predict macromolecular properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate Mw, only one further differential equation for the second moment is needed apart from the mass balances of all species. Unfortunately, in the case of nonlinear processes, the 3 rd moment for example is required for the calculation of the 2 nd , the 4 th for the 3 rd and so on, the so called the closure problem . To circumvent this problem, assumptions on the form of the molecular weight distribution were used (the most common being that by Ref …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%