2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)01136-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical functions for the representation of chromatographic peaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
123
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
0
123
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There exists a range of possible peak representations as described in ref 20. In this paper the most straight forward Gaussian representation is initially demonstrated, although this does not factor in skew within the peak.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There exists a range of possible peak representations as described in ref 20. In this paper the most straight forward Gaussian representation is initially demonstrated, although this does not factor in skew within the peak.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The area of the first eluting Mn and Ca peak was determined by fitting the chromatographic data for Mn and Ca ion intensities. It was assumed that each peak can be fitted using the commonly used EMG profile described by Equation 1 (Di Marco and Bombi, 2001):…”
Section: Peak Fitting and Optimization Procedures For Mn To Ca Ratio Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain an accurate estimate of the molar Mn to Ca ratio, peak fitting was performed using sums of Exponentially Modified Gaussian (EMG) profiles (Supplemental Fig. S3; Di Marco and Bombi, 2001). Assuming that the largest Mn peak and the first Ca peak, with a molecular mass about 900 kD, represent active PSII supercomplexes, the area of the corresponding fitted peaks resulted in a molar Mn to Ca ratio of 4.1 6 0.6 (n = 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This characteristic bell protection profile can be described by many bell functions (Di Marco, 2001). After testing several equations, the generalized exponential function without intercept (also called the modified Weibull distribution function) was found to be the most satisfactory one with least number of parameters and highest accuracy:…”
Section: Standardizations and Fittingsmentioning
confidence: 99%