2009
DOI: 10.1142/s0218202509003772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Framework of the Well Productivity Index for Fast Forchheimer (Non-Darcy) Flows in Porous Media

Abstract: Motivated by the reservoir engineering concept of the well Productivity Index, we introduced and analyzed a functional, denoted as "diffusive capacity", for the solution of the initial-boundary value problem (IBVP) for a linear parabolic equation.21This IBVP described laminar (linear) Darcy flow in porous media; the considered boundary conditions corresponded to different regimes of the well production. The diffusive capacities were then computed as steady state invariants of the solutions to the corresponding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given a constant production rate, the model takes into account the non-Darcy-flow effects inside the fracture, in the perforation tunnels, and in the reservoir for the flow that bypasses the fracture. This paper introduces an improvement in the calculation for non-Darcy flow inside the fracture that honors the velocity distribution inside the fracture (Aulisa et al 2009a(Aulisa et al , 2009b. The traditional approach using the largest velocity inside the fracture located near the intersection unnecessarily overestimates the non-Darcy pressure gradient inside the fracture.…”
Section: Model Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a constant production rate, the model takes into account the non-Darcy-flow effects inside the fracture, in the perforation tunnels, and in the reservoir for the flow that bypasses the fracture. This paper introduces an improvement in the calculation for non-Darcy flow inside the fracture that honors the velocity distribution inside the fracture (Aulisa et al 2009a(Aulisa et al , 2009b. The traditional approach using the largest velocity inside the fracture located near the intersection unnecessarily overestimates the non-Darcy pressure gradient inside the fracture.…”
Section: Model Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of reservoir engineering, fluid flow behavior near the well screen controls the efficiency of oil/gas production wells (e.g., Holditz and Morse 1976;Aulisa et al 2009), as well as the efficiency of injection/extraction wells in groundwater resources applications (e.g., Sen 1989;Mathias and Todman 2010;Wen et al 2011Wen et al , 2013Yeh and Chang 2013;Houben 2015;Mathias and Moutsopoulos 2016). Moreover, nonlinear flow at full-aquifer scale in a broad range of geological formations, such as gravel, karstic or fractured aquifers, is widely addressed in the literature (e.g., Moutsopoulos and Tsihrintzis 2005;Moutsopoulos 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a constant production rate, the model takes into account the non-Darcy flow effects inside the fracture, in the perforation tunnels, and in the reservoir for the flow that bypasses the fracture. This paper introduces an improvement in the calculation for non-Darcy flow inside the fracture that honors the velocity distribution inside the fracture (Aulisa et al 2009). The traditional approach using the largest velocity inside the fracture located near the intersection unnecessarily overestimates the non-Darcy pressure gradient inside the fracture.…”
Section: Model Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 compares the new model (Aulisa et al 2009) described in detail in Appendix C with the method currently favored in the literature based on the adjustment to the proppant pack permeability in the fracture first presented by Gidley (1990). Because the existing method overestimates the non-Darcy effects inside the fracture, it results in somewhat higher total skin and lower fracture flow fraction.…”
Section: Oil Well Sensitivity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation