“…The adequacy of the stationary mathematical model (1)−( 4), as noted, depends on the choice of the variables λ, β, c p and on the choice of the type of dependence Z(p, T ) of the compressibility coefficient in the investigated range of pressure, temperature and flow changes. The system of equations (1)−( 4) is supplemented by the boundary condition z = 0 : p = P(0), T = T (0), (5) where P(0), T (0) are dimensional pressure and temperature at the gas pipeline inlet. The solution of the system of equations (1)−(4) under the boundary condition (5) exists and is unique in a wide range of Q 0 , P(0), T (0), R and L. The numerical solution can be obtained with high accuracy, for example, by the Runge−Kutta method.…”
Section: Mathematical Model Of Non-isothermalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression (9) for the variable c p includes the values of temperature and pressure at the outlet. These variables either are measured experimentally or can be calculated using the system of equations (1)−( 4) with boundary condition (5). In the second case, the variable c p is calculated iteratively.…”
Section: Calculation Of Value C P (P T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution of the problem of calculating the coordinates of the gas leak according to model (1)−( 4) is given in [5]. The analysis of these calculations showed that there is a range of parameters Q 0 , P(0), T (0), R, L, β, λ, T * change, in which, with an acceptable accuracy, it is possible to calculate the pressure and temperature distributions in the gas flow using simplified models.…”
Section: Simplified Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous publications have been devoted to calculations of the leak location in gas pipelines and wells based on a mathematical model of gas flow, starting with the fundamental work of Vasiliev, Bondarev, Voevodin and Kanibolotsky [1], up to the present, for example, papers [2][3][4][5]. Success in solving this problem is impossible without creating an adequate mathematical model of gas flow under the conditions under study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paper [9] also presents a solution of the problem of calculating the coordinates of a stationary gas leak by iteration using quasilinearization for superhigh pressures (under the assumption of a stable flow pattern both before the leak and some time after its occurrence). The solution of the similar problem for medium pressures is given in [5]. In this paper we consider the admissibility of using relatively simple models for calculating the coordinate of the stationary leak in gas pipelines, the pressure in which does not exceed 100 atm.…”
For gas transportation through pipes in normal and emergency modes, a comparison of calculations based on mathematical models of various degrees of generality is presented. A mathematical model of a non-isothermal steady flow of a mixture of gases and its simplified versions are studied. For simplified options, simple analytical dependencies were obtained for calculating flow characteristics and calculating the location of an emergency gas leak. Examples of calculations of pressure distributions, temperature and leakage coordinates in gas pipelines of medium pressures according to the general and simplified models are provided. The examples cover the parameter change area of practical interest. The conditions for the admissibility of using simplified models for calculating the coordinates of a leak of medium intensity and different locations are determined. Keywords: gas pipelines, adequacy of the model, simplifications, calculation of the place of emergency leakage, compressibility factor.
“…The adequacy of the stationary mathematical model (1)−( 4), as noted, depends on the choice of the variables λ, β, c p and on the choice of the type of dependence Z(p, T ) of the compressibility coefficient in the investigated range of pressure, temperature and flow changes. The system of equations (1)−( 4) is supplemented by the boundary condition z = 0 : p = P(0), T = T (0), (5) where P(0), T (0) are dimensional pressure and temperature at the gas pipeline inlet. The solution of the system of equations (1)−(4) under the boundary condition (5) exists and is unique in a wide range of Q 0 , P(0), T (0), R and L. The numerical solution can be obtained with high accuracy, for example, by the Runge−Kutta method.…”
Section: Mathematical Model Of Non-isothermalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression (9) for the variable c p includes the values of temperature and pressure at the outlet. These variables either are measured experimentally or can be calculated using the system of equations (1)−( 4) with boundary condition (5). In the second case, the variable c p is calculated iteratively.…”
Section: Calculation Of Value C P (P T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution of the problem of calculating the coordinates of the gas leak according to model (1)−( 4) is given in [5]. The analysis of these calculations showed that there is a range of parameters Q 0 , P(0), T (0), R, L, β, λ, T * change, in which, with an acceptable accuracy, it is possible to calculate the pressure and temperature distributions in the gas flow using simplified models.…”
Section: Simplified Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous publications have been devoted to calculations of the leak location in gas pipelines and wells based on a mathematical model of gas flow, starting with the fundamental work of Vasiliev, Bondarev, Voevodin and Kanibolotsky [1], up to the present, for example, papers [2][3][4][5]. Success in solving this problem is impossible without creating an adequate mathematical model of gas flow under the conditions under study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paper [9] also presents a solution of the problem of calculating the coordinates of a stationary gas leak by iteration using quasilinearization for superhigh pressures (under the assumption of a stable flow pattern both before the leak and some time after its occurrence). The solution of the similar problem for medium pressures is given in [5]. In this paper we consider the admissibility of using relatively simple models for calculating the coordinate of the stationary leak in gas pipelines, the pressure in which does not exceed 100 atm.…”
For gas transportation through pipes in normal and emergency modes, a comparison of calculations based on mathematical models of various degrees of generality is presented. A mathematical model of a non-isothermal steady flow of a mixture of gases and its simplified versions are studied. For simplified options, simple analytical dependencies were obtained for calculating flow characteristics and calculating the location of an emergency gas leak. Examples of calculations of pressure distributions, temperature and leakage coordinates in gas pipelines of medium pressures according to the general and simplified models are provided. The examples cover the parameter change area of practical interest. The conditions for the admissibility of using simplified models for calculating the coordinates of a leak of medium intensity and different locations are determined. Keywords: gas pipelines, adequacy of the model, simplifications, calculation of the place of emergency leakage, compressibility factor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.