2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1710.07678
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$\mathcal{P}_m$ Interior Penalty Nonconforming Finite Element Methods for $2m$-th Order PDEs in $\mathbb{R}^n$

Abstract: In this work, we propose a family of interior penalty nonconforming finite element methods for 2m-th order partial differential equations in R n , for any m ≥ 0, n ≥ 1. For the nonconforming finite element, the shape function space consists of all polynomials with a degree not greater than m and is hence minimal. This family of finite element spaces has some natural inclusion properties as in the corresponding Sobolev spaces in the continuous cases. By applying the interior penalty to the bilinear form, we est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeat the argument for each pair of edges to conclude {D(e, r 1 )\D(∆ 0 (e), r 0 ), e ∈ ∆ 1 (T )} are disjoint. Then (22) follows.…”
Section: (23)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Repeat the argument for each pair of edges to conclude {D(e, r 1 )\D(∆ 0 (e), r 0 ), e ∈ ∆ 1 (T )} are disjoint. Then (22) follows.…”
Section: (23)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, the lowest order nonconforming finite elements on simplexes were devised in [21,20,23] for m ≤ n and k = m + 1. We refer to [22,11,12] for more H m -nonconforming finite elements and [4,13,14] for H m -conforming and nonconforming virtual elements on any shape of polytope K in R n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element space in [18] is generalized for m = d + 1 by Wu and Xu in [21]. Recently in [22], it is further generalized for arbitrary m and d but with stabilization along mesh interface in order to balance the weak continuity and the penalty terms. In order to obtain stability and optimal convergence in some discrete H m -norm, [18,21,22] propose to compute numerical approximation to D m u, such that their implementation may become quite complicated as m is large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently in [22], it is further generalized for arbitrary m and d but with stabilization along mesh interface in order to balance the weak continuity and the penalty terms. In order to obtain stability and optimal convergence in some discrete H m -norm, [18,21,22] propose to compute numerical approximation to D m u, such that their implementation may become quite complicated as m is large. The finite element spaces in [3,13] can be used to solve numerically (1.1) with any source term f ∈ H −m (Ω).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For general m, nonconforming elements on the simplices are easier to construct than conforming ones. In [36,35], Wang and Xu constructed the minimal H m -nonconforming elements in any dimension with constraint m ≤ n. Recently Wu and Xu extended these minimal H m -nonconforming elements to m = n + 1 by enriching the space of shape functions with bubble functions in [39], and to arbitrary m and n by using the interior penalty technique in [38]. In two dimensions, Hu and Zhang designed the H mnonconforming elements on the triangle for any m in [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%