2018
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal variants in NLRP and other maternal effect proteins are associated with multilocus imprinting disturbance in offspring

Abstract: BackgroundGenomic imprinting results from the resistance of germline epigenetic marks to reprogramming in the early embryo for a small number of mammalian genes. Genetic, epigenetic or environmental insults that prevent imprints from evading reprogramming may result in imprinting disorders, which impact growth, development, behaviour and metabolism. We aimed to identify genetic defects causing imprinting disorders by whole-exome sequencing in families with one or more members affected by multilocus imprinting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
115
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These genes are generally considered to have a ‘maternal effect’ since they have a key role during the early embryonic stages before full zygotic genome activation. Maternally derived mutations of these genes cause impaired or delayed preimplantation development and have been associated to MLID development through oocyte-stored transcripts [37]. Nevertheless, our data do not sustain this hypothesis, since the paternally-derived NLRP2 mutation could impair methylation, suggesting a function of NLRP2 occurring after embryonic-genome activation rather than via oocyte-stored transcripts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These genes are generally considered to have a ‘maternal effect’ since they have a key role during the early embryonic stages before full zygotic genome activation. Maternally derived mutations of these genes cause impaired or delayed preimplantation development and have been associated to MLID development through oocyte-stored transcripts [37]. Nevertheless, our data do not sustain this hypothesis, since the paternally-derived NLRP2 mutation could impair methylation, suggesting a function of NLRP2 occurring after embryonic-genome activation rather than via oocyte-stored transcripts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Overall, the absence of MLID and phenotypic effect in both carrier fathers may be explained by incomplete penetrance, as already reported for NLRP2 [21,37] and ZFP57 mutations [40]. Defining and proving the pathogenic effect of MLID-associated mutations is, indeed, challenging, given the poorly established mechanism of transmission and lack of information about the roles of analyzed factors in methylation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Recently, additional rare variants in the maternal NLRP2 gene were shown to be associated with MLID in the offspring 27. In that study, six probands from five families diagnosed with multilocus imprinting disturbance (MLID) whose mothers carried NLRP2 mutations were identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maternal-effect variants in all three genes have been postulated to be associated with reproductive problems, including pregnancy losses, infertility, and MLID in liveborn children. As mentioned before, MLID is present in a significant number of patients with SRS and BWS, and in fact children born to mothers with NLPR2, NLRP5, and NLRP7 maternal effect variants often exhibit features of these imprinting disorders [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…refs. [17,18,22]). In case clinical data were provided, clinical scoring for SRS was performed by applying the Netchine-Harbison (NH) scoring system [1].…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%