2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Talk in Cognitive Development: Relations between Psychological Lexicon, Semantic Development, Empathy, and Temperament

Abstract: In this study, we investigated the relationship between mothers' psychological lexicon and children's cognitive and socio-emotive development as assessed through conceptual and semantic understanding tasks, in addition to the traditional tasks of theory of mind. Currently, there is considerable evidence to suggest that the frequency of mothers' mental state words used in mother-child picture-book reading is linked with children's theory of mind skills. Furthermore, mothers' use of cognitive terms is more stron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the existence of a relation between these two domains has been disputed ( Tager-Flusberg and Sullivan, 1995 ; Charman and Shmueli-Goetz, 1998 ; Meins et al, 2006 ; Longobardi et al, 2016b ), the spontaneous production of mental state language (MSL: a specific type of language including perceptual, physiological, emotional, cognitive and moral terms) has been shown to forerun and predict the acquisition of ToM and, more generally, the emergence of meta-representational awareness ( Beeghly et al, 1986 ; Bartsch and Wellman, 1995 ). In agreement, significant positive associations between ToM and MSL have been reported by studies examining the behavior of preschool children in a variety of interactive contexts (e.g., book reading; Dunn et al, 1991 ; Hughes and Dunn, 1998 ; Rollo and Sulla, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Although the existence of a relation between these two domains has been disputed ( Tager-Flusberg and Sullivan, 1995 ; Charman and Shmueli-Goetz, 1998 ; Meins et al, 2006 ; Longobardi et al, 2016b ), the spontaneous production of mental state language (MSL: a specific type of language including perceptual, physiological, emotional, cognitive and moral terms) has been shown to forerun and predict the acquisition of ToM and, more generally, the emergence of meta-representational awareness ( Beeghly et al, 1986 ; Bartsch and Wellman, 1995 ). In agreement, significant positive associations between ToM and MSL have been reported by studies examining the behavior of preschool children in a variety of interactive contexts (e.g., book reading; Dunn et al, 1991 ; Hughes and Dunn, 1998 ; Rollo and Sulla, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…During shared book-reading, parents ask their children, for example, how they think the story protagonists feel, why the character might have acted in a certain way or what the character might think will happen on the next page. Mothers use various emotional words (to enjoy, to be afraid) and their own empathy levels are linked to the amount of ability states (e.g., ‘you can do it’) that they refer to during book sharing (Rollo and Sulla, 2016). Children whose mothers used cognitive verbs such as think, believe, remember, know or understand, during book-reading showed higher understanding of mental states after the book reading session (Adrián et al, 2007).…”
Section: Explanatory Pathways In Developmental Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from this extensive body of research have resulted in the identification of key themes, which have highlighted the purported purposes and affordances of engaging in this social practice with children. Such themes include improvement in children’s vocabulary (Mol et al., 2008), cognitive understandings and oral language proficiency (Cheng and Tsai, 2014; Mol and Bus, 2011), knowledge of story, concepts about print and literary register (Phillips et al., 2008), phonemic awareness (Bus et al., 1995; Deckner et al., 2006), the development of social and emotional knowledge (Rollo and Sulla, 2016; Taumoepeau and Ruffman, 2006) and supporting the value of reading that will result in positive long-term outcomes (Melhuish et al., 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%