1993
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92528-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal supplementation and birthweight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(19) indicated that a 3400‐g baby in the vertex position could pass through a pelvis with an obstetric conjugate of 10 cm. The mean birthweight of Malawian adolescents (2688 g) was well below this value, confirming the view (21, 22) that the effects of nutritional supplementation would need to be many fold greater before the risk of CPD would be increased. The evidence for adolescents who are better nourished and who have larger babies suggests a lower incidence of CPD compared with older women (23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…(19) indicated that a 3400‐g baby in the vertex position could pass through a pelvis with an obstetric conjugate of 10 cm. The mean birthweight of Malawian adolescents (2688 g) was well below this value, confirming the view (21, 22) that the effects of nutritional supplementation would need to be many fold greater before the risk of CPD would be increased. The evidence for adolescents who are better nourished and who have larger babies suggests a lower incidence of CPD compared with older women (23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Using X-ray pelvimetry, Joyce et al (19) indicated that a 3400-g baby in the vertex position could pass through a pelvis with an obstetric conjugate of 10 cm. The mean birthweight of Malawian adolescents (2688 g) was well below this value, confirming the view (21,22) that the effects of nutritional supplementation would need to be many fold greater before the risk of CPD would be in-creased. The evidence for adolescents who are better nourished and who have larger babies suggests a lower incidence of CPD compared with older women (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Based on this evidence it is doubtful that, “interventions to increase fetal growth in these circumstances might result in worse, rather than better, maternal and child health” 11 . Whereas the change in head size and therefore delivery risk is not significantly changed, the benefit of nutritional supplementation to maternal nutritional status and fetal growth during pregnancy and the benefits derived later during lactation are well documented 26 . Stunted growth has long been recognised as a consequence of chronic under nutrition and poor health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%