2004
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Regulation of Infant Reactivity From 2 to 6 Months.

Abstract: Previous research has investigated the effect of maternal soothing behaviors on reducing infant reactivity but not the differential effects of specific maternal behaviors on infant stress responses. The present study investigated maternal regulation of 2-and 6-month-olds' responses to an inoculation and found a significant decline with age in both the intensity and duration of infants' crying. Maternal affection and touching decreased from 2 to 6 months, whereas maternal vocalizing and distraction behaviors in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
95
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These interpretations, however, must be considered with respect to characteristics of the FFSF procedure. Prior research (Jahromi et al, 2004) suggests that, in response to infant distress, mothers should use more vigorous soothing behaviors, such as holding and actively rocking their infants, rather than the limited techniques that can be used during a face-to-face interaction (e.g., touching, vocal soothing, distraction, vocalizations). Regardless, these findings indicate that patterns of play behaviors before the Still-Face contribute to infant, mother, and dyadic responses to the maternal Still-Face and Reunion episodes, highlighting the fact that infant characteristics are important in accounting for the transactional nature of mother-infant interactions and the ability of infants to cope with the stress (Mesman et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These interpretations, however, must be considered with respect to characteristics of the FFSF procedure. Prior research (Jahromi et al, 2004) suggests that, in response to infant distress, mothers should use more vigorous soothing behaviors, such as holding and actively rocking their infants, rather than the limited techniques that can be used during a face-to-face interaction (e.g., touching, vocal soothing, distraction, vocalizations). Regardless, these findings indicate that patterns of play behaviors before the Still-Face contribute to infant, mother, and dyadic responses to the maternal Still-Face and Reunion episodes, highlighting the fact that infant characteristics are important in accounting for the transactional nature of mother-infant interactions and the ability of infants to cope with the stress (Mesman et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, we did not find differences among the three clusters for maternal socio-demographic characteristics and depressive symptomatology, so that these factors did not appear sufficient to account for the individual differences in the infants' behavior observed in the Negatively Engaged cluster. Possibly, some specific infant characteristics (i.e., high negativity, no positivity and low social contact) solicit these types of monitoring behaviors from the caregiver, who adjust their behavior to modulate the reactivity of their infants (Jahromi, Putnam, & Stifter, 2004), perhaps because they regarded high negativity of their infants as a challenge or/and as a signal of special need (Crockenberg, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multimodal interventions applied by a parent have been shown to alleviate procedural pain in infants (Bellieni et al, 2007). A combination of maternal soothing behaviours has shown to decrease infant reactivity in a painful situation (Jahromi, Putnam, & Stifter, 2004). The combination that was most used among the mothers and most effective at reducing all levels of infant distress, was holding/rocking together with soothing vocalising behaviours (Jahromi et al, 2004).…”
Section: Parental Singing As Social Affective Pain Alleviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of maternal soothing behaviours has shown to decrease infant reactivity in a painful situation (Jahromi, Putnam, & Stifter, 2004). The combination that was most used among the mothers and most effective at reducing all levels of infant distress, was holding/rocking together with soothing vocalising behaviours (Jahromi et al, 2004). Singing with an infant is a social and often multimodal action, which includes rhythmically organised auditory, visual, olfactory, tactile, kinaesthetic and vestibular modalities (Longhi, 2009;MacKinlay & Baker, 2005;Trehub et al, 2015).…”
Section: Parental Singing As Social Affective Pain Alleviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hertenstein, 2002;Moszkowski & Stack, 2007;Kisilevsky, Stack & Muir, 1991). Furthermore, Jahromi, Putnam and Stifter (2004) found that the duration and intensity of infant cry during immunisation decreased with affectionate touch and vocalisations by mothers.…”
Section: Infant Pain Expression Is Mediated By the Caregivermentioning
confidence: 96%