2005
DOI: 10.1080/14616730500245963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal reflective functioning, mother–infant affective communication, and infant attachment: Exploring the link between mental states and observed caregiving behavior in the intergenerational transmission of attachment

Abstract: This study examines the link between mental representations and maternal behavior within the intergenerational transmission of attachment. Maternal reflective functioning was hypothesized to predict the quality of mother-infant affective communication based on the AMBIANCE measure. Each of these measures was also considered as a predictor of the quality of infant attachment. The subjects were 45 mothers and their 10-14-month-old infants. Results supported each of the study's major hypotheses. The AMBIANCE meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
190
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
13
190
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of theory and evidence that maternal sensitivity influences the development of attachment security (for review, see Belsky & Fearon, 2008), it should not be surprising that so does parental mentalizing (Arnott & Meins, 2007;Lundy, 2003;Meins, Fernyhough, Fradley, & Tuckey, 2001;Slade et al, 2005). In fact, in some cases it does so over and above traditional measures of maternal care, including of maternal sensitivity (Kelly, Slade, & Grienenberger, 2005;Koren-Karie et al, 2002;Laranjo, Bernier, & Meins, 2008;Meins et al, 2001). But just like maternal sensitivity, it is not just attachment security that mentalizing predicts.…”
Section: Effects Of Mentalizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of theory and evidence that maternal sensitivity influences the development of attachment security (for review, see Belsky & Fearon, 2008), it should not be surprising that so does parental mentalizing (Arnott & Meins, 2007;Lundy, 2003;Meins, Fernyhough, Fradley, & Tuckey, 2001;Slade et al, 2005). In fact, in some cases it does so over and above traditional measures of maternal care, including of maternal sensitivity (Kelly, Slade, & Grienenberger, 2005;Koren-Karie et al, 2002;Laranjo, Bernier, & Meins, 2008;Meins et al, 2001). But just like maternal sensitivity, it is not just attachment security that mentalizing predicts.…”
Section: Effects Of Mentalizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attachment leads to an effective relationship between mothers and infants, which is specialized to themselves; as a result of this relationship, both mothers and infants can feel secure and this can lead to emergence of first social relationship patterns in infants (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por el lado de la investigación diversos autores a nivel mundial y desde variadas perspectivas han abordado el tema. Un ejemplo es el trabajo que se ha realizado para detectar problemas en la percepción de la señal entre madres con TLP y sus bebés, destacando que las madres con TLP pueden manejar dificultades a este nivel, ya que no captarían de forma efectiva las señales perceptuales correspondientes a necesidades del bebé, lo que podría influir en la calidad del vínculo y en la capacidad de respuesta de la madre para satisfacer las necesidades fisiológicas y emocionales del bebé (Elliot et al, 2014;Grienenberger, Kelly, & Slade, 2005;Lanfranco & Canales-Johnson, 2014;Preißler, Dziobek, Ritter, Heekeren, & Roepke, 2010;Spinrad, Stifter, Donelan McCall, & Turner, 2004). Sin embargo, Guendelman (2014) sostiene que los resultados de los estudios sobre cognición social y percepción no siempre concuerdan.…”
Section: Ntroducciónunclassified