1991
DOI: 10.1016/0892-0362(91)90062-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal recall of alcohol, cocaine, and marijuana use during pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
74
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
74
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Other limitations include the measurement of prenatal exposure by retrospective self-report. Work comparing prospectively and retrospectively collected data about pregnancy has supported the accuracy of pregnancy data collected by retrospective self-report (Buka et al, 2004;Jacobson et al, 1991). Similarly, comparison of serum cotinine concentrations and self-reported smoking behavior during pregnancy has yielded evidence of significant agreement between these measures (Buka et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Other limitations include the measurement of prenatal exposure by retrospective self-report. Work comparing prospectively and retrospectively collected data about pregnancy has supported the accuracy of pregnancy data collected by retrospective self-report (Buka et al, 2004;Jacobson et al, 1991). Similarly, comparison of serum cotinine concentrations and self-reported smoking behavior during pregnancy has yielded evidence of significant agreement between these measures (Buka et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Also, comparison of prospective and retrospective data for drinking during pregnancy has shown retrospective data to be valid (Griesler and Kandel, 1998). Moreover, follow-up of women for 4 and 5 years following their pregnancies has shown substantial reliability (r =0.53 and 0.67, respectively) between reports obtained during pregnancy and those obtained following pregnancy (Ernhart et al, 1988;Jacobson et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We are aware that self-reported alcohol consumption around conception cannot accurately reflect the amount of alcohol intake at the time of sampling, at delivery. However, pregnant women tend to underreport their alcohol consumption, 34,35 and this effect is likely to increase during the course of pregnancy. 32,36 Previous studies have shown that women who drink the most around the time they discover they are pregnant, as assessed by AAD and AADD, are more likely to continue to drink throughout pregnancy, and to drink in binge patterns, although both the self-reported and the actual levels of consumption are usually reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,36 Previous studies have shown that women who drink the most around the time they discover they are pregnant, as assessed by AAD and AADD, are more likely to continue to drink throughout pregnancy, and to drink in binge patterns, although both the self-reported and the actual levels of consumption are usually reduced. [32][33][34][35][36] Therefore, asking the women about their drinking habits around the time of conception seems to better reflect the actual amount of alcohol consumption over the course of the pregnancy than repeated questionnaires. It is interesting that an index of binge drinking, as assessed by the amount of alcohol (in grams) con- sumed per drinking day (ie, AADD), had a more profound influence in predicting DHA and AA levels than did the average daily alcohol consumption (ie, AAD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation