2007
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-1381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Psychological Reaction to Newborn Genetic Screening for Type 1 Diabetes

Abstract: Newborn genetic screening to identify infants at risk for type 1 diabetes is not associated with elevated levels of maternal anxiety, depressive symptoms, or heightened perceptions of infant vulnerability. However, responses to subjective assessment questions suggest that it is possible that more subtle effects on mothers do occur, and this requires further investigation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A full description of the KEA study protocol has been published elsewhere. 11 The KEA study itself was discontinued after 3 years due to lack of ongoing funding: at this stage all families of children with increased genetic risk were offered annual antibody surveillance (the appearance of diabetes-related autoantibodies in genetically susceptible young children is highly predictive of future development of T1D). 12 One child in the cohort developed single-antibody positivity and has been entered into TrialNet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A full description of the KEA study protocol has been published elsewhere. 11 The KEA study itself was discontinued after 3 years due to lack of ongoing funding: at this stage all families of children with increased genetic risk were offered annual antibody surveillance (the appearance of diabetes-related autoantibodies in genetically susceptible young children is highly predictive of future development of T1D). 12 One child in the cohort developed single-antibody positivity and has been entered into TrialNet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,14 The study described here forms part of a comprehensive continuation of this arm that aims to investigate later psychosocial effects. This article describes data from a single interview conducted with mothers of children at increased genetic risk for T1D 12-13 years after newborn testing.…”
Section: Psychosocial Effects Arm Of the Kea Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 The above mentioned misinterpretation of negative HLA findings opens the question whether parents correctly understand the results of HLA-typing for CD and of susceptibility genetic testing in general. 23 Paradoxical risk interpretation of genetic testing has also been reported in newborn screening for type 1 diabetes, 14 with 10% of mothers overestimating or underestimating the risk. It is also known that processing statistical information is often difficult for people and that interpretation of results may be dependent on several factors, such as personal and cultural opinions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True negative results (meaning that an individual does not carry a known mutation in the family) can lead to relief and a reduction in unnecessary invasive screening, 6,7 but they can also lead to survivor guilt, concerns over care-giving responsibilities if the individual is the only unaffected family member, and the need to entirely reframe one's self-image. 8 Positive results may lead to informed decisions regarding medical screening and interventions (eg, increased or earlier surveillance, prophylactic surgeries to reduce risks), 6,7 but they can also lead to anxiety about if and when medical problems may occur 9,10 and, in some extreme cases, the avoidance of screening because of a sense of genetic determinism. Positive results can also lead to anxiety about reproductive decision-making and can influence social life planning in various ways (eg, education, employment decisions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%