2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79178-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and foetal acidosis in vaginal and caesarean deliveries: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study

Abstract: A high maternal body mass index (BMI) is associated with increased risks of asphyxia-related neonatal morbidity. We evaluated the association between maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and foetal acidosis while accounting for the mode of delivery. Participants from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study with singleton pregnancies after 22 weeks of gestation who gave birth during 2011–2014 were included. The participants (n = 71,799) were categorised into five groups according to the pre-pregnancy BMI: G1 (BMI <… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, some studies validated the appropriate gestational weight gain for different pre-pregnancy BMI categories based on the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in Japan. 14,15,17,18 In the present study, we referred to pre-pregnancy BMI categories and recommended weight gain during pregnancy based on these studies (Table 2), because both participants of previous studies and those of the present study comprised only Japanese individuals, and we used validated placental weight accounting for gestational age and sex of newborns using a Japanese sample. 16 Overweight and obesity are often the consequence of an accumulation of unhealthy lifestyles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, some studies validated the appropriate gestational weight gain for different pre-pregnancy BMI categories based on the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in Japan. 14,15,17,18 In the present study, we referred to pre-pregnancy BMI categories and recommended weight gain during pregnancy based on these studies (Table 2), because both participants of previous studies and those of the present study comprised only Japanese individuals, and we used validated placental weight accounting for gestational age and sex of newborns using a Japanese sample. 16 Overweight and obesity are often the consequence of an accumulation of unhealthy lifestyles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were categorized into five groups according to their BMI before pregnancy: group 1 (G1), <18.5 kg/m 2 ; group 2 (G2), 18.5 to <20.0 kg/m 2 ; group 3 (G3), 20.0 to <23.0 kg/m 2 ; group 4 (G4), 23.0 to <25.0 kg/m 2 ; and group 5 (G5), > 25.0 kg/m 2 . 14,17,18 Gestational weight gain was calculated by subtracting the weight before pregnancy (kg) from the weight immediately before delivery (kg). Thus, for the subsequent analysis of pre-pregnancy BMI on the z-score of placental weight, gestational weight gain was categorized into "insufficient," "appropriate," or "excessive," based on the pre-pregnancy BMI according to criteria described by previous Japanese epidemiological study (Table 1).…”
Section: Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 26 BMI before pregnancy was categorised into three groups (<18.5 kg/m 2 , 18.5–24.9 kg/m 2 and ≥25.0 kg/m 2 ). 27 Parity was categorised into two groups (nulliparous and multiparous).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maternal participants were divided into three age groups when reporting childbirth details (nearly equal to the age at childbirth): <20, 20–34, and ≥35 years 30,31 . Maternal BMI before pregnancy was categorized 32 as <18.5, 18.5–24.9, and ≥25.0 kg/m 2 . Parity was categorized as nulliparous and multiparous.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%