2009
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2008.365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Periodontal Disease and Risk of Preeclampsia: A Case-Control Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
30
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
30
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Only two studies [63], [64] gained the maximum score in the Selection outcome; nine studies [15], [19], [24], [25], [26], [52], [63], [64], [65] had the maximum score in the Comparability outcome; and all studies had a partial score in the Exposure outcome.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Only two studies [63], [64] gained the maximum score in the Selection outcome; nine studies [15], [19], [24], [25], [26], [52], [63], [64], [65] had the maximum score in the Comparability outcome; and all studies had a partial score in the Exposure outcome.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The sample size varied from 54 patients in the study of Chaparro et al [60] to 1206 in the study of Siqueira et al [67]. Three studies [24], [26], [66] did not found a positive association between PD and PE, whereas the remaining studies reported a significant association.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2003, the first study that suggested that periodontitis could increase the risk of preeclampsia was published 22 . Although observational studies 23‐31 and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 32‐34 have since been performed, as yet there is insufficient scientific evidence to support this association. This is possibly attributable to a number of reasons, such as the lack of a standard definition for periodontitis, methodologic errors involving sample selection, the best manner in which to analyze risk factors common to the two diseases, and, of course, problems related to studies conducted among differing population groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%