1986
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90418-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal malnutrition in the rat: Effects on food intake and body weight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in agreement with previous studies, [50][51][52] alterations in food consumption were observed during lactation. Specifically, 9 days after delivery, rats fed the 8% protein diet reduced in absolute terms their daily food intake by 48% in relation to control dams with a significant diet  time interaction (F 11, 154 ¼ 20.95, Po0.0001) and by 30% when food intake was normalized to body weight (C ¼ 212.57±9.97 kcal 100 g À1 of body weight, n ¼ 7 vs LP 149.72±12.62 kcal 100 g À1 of body weight, n ¼ 9, Po0.001).…”
Section: Genesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, in agreement with previous studies, [50][51][52] alterations in food consumption were observed during lactation. Specifically, 9 days after delivery, rats fed the 8% protein diet reduced in absolute terms their daily food intake by 48% in relation to control dams with a significant diet  time interaction (F 11, 154 ¼ 20.95, Po0.0001) and by 30% when food intake was normalized to body weight (C ¼ 212.57±9.97 kcal 100 g À1 of body weight, n ¼ 7 vs LP 149.72±12.62 kcal 100 g À1 of body weight, n ¼ 9, Po0.001).…”
Section: Genesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We previously reported that the protein content of the diet does not affect food intake during pregnancy in our model. 22 However, in this study, and possibly due to the use of saline even in control animals, we did report a difference in the two nutrition groups, notably an increase in the food consumption of low protein rats on days 8–11. Cocaine administration reduced food intake in both nutrition groups.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…We chose to examine the effects of protein restriction as a means to institute malnutrition because of the significant amount of work relating how dietary protein levels influence somatic growth (Kanarek et al, 1986), the development of dendritic morphology (Benitez-Bribiesca et al, 1999; Cordero et al, 2003), neurogenesis (King et al, 2002, 2004), sensory development (Puthuraya et al, 1980; Sjostrom et al, 1984, 1985, 1987a,b; Almli et al, 1985; Conradi et al, 1985, 1989, 1990; Sjostrom and Conradi, 1987, 1989; Conradi and Sjostrom, 1989; Vilela et al, 2005), as well as influence a variety of behaviors and underlying neural circuits (Cintra et al, 1997; Morgane et al, 2002; Mokler et al, 2003). Clearly, other dietary manipulations may yield similar (or different) results than found here because insufficient amounts of a single nutrient can significantly alter nervous system development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%