Maternal knowledge and views regarding early hearing detection and intervention in children aged 0–5 years at a semi-urban primary care clinic in South Africa

Abstract

Background South Africans have an increasing burden of hearing loss, especially in low-income rural areas. Limited information is available regarding caregivers’ knowledge and views regarding infant hearing loss, which is essential for the successful implementation of early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programmes. Objectives The main aim of the study was to describe the knowledge and views of mothers with children aged between 0 and 5 years old regarding hearing screening, risk factors, symptoms of hearing loss, and intervention options for hearing loss. Method A survey was employed at a primary care clinic to gain insight into the maternal views on hearing loss and early intervention services for children aged 0–5 years old. Results The majority (83.2%) of the mothers believed that hearing can be tested at birth, 90.7% believed in the biomedical model of intervention which is based on cure, prevention, and pathology as opposed to traditional or alternative medicinal beliefs, and 95.3% indicated that they would seek medical attention if they noticed symptoms of hearing loss. Consequences of hearing loss, such as academic, communication and social problems, were indicated by 65.4% of mothers. Conclusion The findings demonstrated that although cultural beliefs regarding superstitious causes of hearing loss and use of traditional medicine exist, satisfactory maternal knowledge regarding detection and intervention for hearing loss is present. Maternal views are favourable and a general willingness to participate in EHDI programmes was present. This study advocates for the implementation of EHDI programmes at all primary healthcare clinics across South Africa.

Communication barriers and deaf learner misbehaviour in a South African special needs school

“…Cochlear implants are being used in South Africa, mainly in urban areas, to give those with severe to profound hearing loss access to sound and spoken language. However, in rural regions, there is a lack of access to healthcare services, which results in undetected or untreated hearing loss (Ehlert & Coetzer, 2020). (Kuschke, 2021).…”

Analysis of a hearing loss identification and intervention program in the first years of life in primary care

“…However, this is an age group in which parents and guardians have high chances of identifying the main symptoms of disabling hearing loss. Identification by the parents themselves can occur accurately, especially if the child's hearing loss affects the frequencies of speech sounds and if it is, minimally, a moderate or bilateral hearing loss [32][33][34][35][36] . Similarly, for the first year of life, involvement, family observation and continuous monitoring are essential, given that, even with the use of a validated instrument, a sensitivity of 67% is estimated, with a false-negative rate of 33%, for not identifying unilateral hearing loss 18 .…”

Análise de um programa de identificação e intervenção da perda auditiva nos primeiros anos de vida na atenção primária

“…No entanto, trata-se de uma faixa etária em que os pais e responsáveis possuem grandes chances de identificação dos principais sintomas das perdas auditivas incapacitantes. A identificação pelos próprios pais pode ocorrer de forma precisa, especialmente se a perda auditiva da criança afetar as frequências dos sons de fala e se for, minimamente, uma perda auditiva moderada ou bilateral [32][33][34][35][36] . De forma similar, para o primeiro ano de vida, o envolvimento, a observação familiar e o acompanhamento contínuo são essenciais, tendo em vista que, mesmo com a utilização de instrumento validado, é estimada uma sensibilidade de 67%, com taxa de falso-negativo de 33%, por não identificar as perdas auditivas unilaterais 18 .…”