2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-1128-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal investment, sibling competition, and offspring survival with increasing litter size and parity in pigs (Sus scrofa)

Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of litter size and parity on sibling competition, piglet survival, and weight gain. It was predicted that competition for teats would increase with increasing litter size, resulting in a higher mortality due to maternal infanticide (i.e., crushing) and starvation, thus keeping the number of surviving piglets constant. We predicted negative effects on weight gain with increasing litter size. Based on maternal investment theory, we also predicted that piglet morta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
80
3
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
10
80
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have established a similar unfavourable relationship between increased parity and preweaning survival (Jarvis et al, 2005;Weber et al, 2009;Andersen et al, 2011). In the present study, first-parity sows gave birth to fewer live-born piglets than older sows.…”
Section: Influence Of Parity On Piglet Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have established a similar unfavourable relationship between increased parity and preweaning survival (Jarvis et al, 2005;Weber et al, 2009;Andersen et al, 2011). In the present study, first-parity sows gave birth to fewer live-born piglets than older sows.…”
Section: Influence Of Parity On Piglet Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the present study, first-parity sows gave birth to fewer live-born piglets than older sows. Increased litter size has a negative impact on piglet mortality (Andersen et al, 2011) and a greater number of piglets in the pen make more piglets available for crushing when the sow lies down (Weary et al, 1998). However, there were no difference in the number of live-born deaths between sows of parities 2, 3 to 4 and 5 to 8, indicating that not only the number of piglets caused older sows to have a higher piglet mortality.…”
Section: Influence Of Parity On Piglet Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the number of suckling piglets on day 21 did impact the ADG, the ADG being negatively correlated with the number of suckling piglets. This is in agreement with several previous studies showing a reduced weight at weaning in large litters (Milligan et al, 2002;Andersen et al, 2011) and a Danish study indicating that in larger litters (11 to 15 suckling piglets), the addition of one extra piglet results in a reduction in weaning weight of~150 g/extra piglet (Thorup, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Piglets are totally dependent on their mother when they are born, and adequate intake of good quality colostrum is fundamental for their immediate and longer-term survival (Edwards, 2002). In this respect, a short latency to find a teat and suckle is vital for a newborn piglet (Andersen et al, 2011). Udder conformation plays a role in this; modern sows have larger body size and sub-optimal udder conformation that affects the ability of the newborn piglets to find a teat and suckle (Vasdal and Andersen, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%