2017
DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2017.1347241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal inflammatory diet and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Circulating cytokines and genomic imprinting as potential regulators?

Abstract: Excessive inflammation during pregnancy alters homeostatic mechanisms of the developing fetus and has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes. An anti-inflammatory diet could be a promising avenue to combat the pro-inflammatory state of pregnancy, particularly in obese women, but we lack mechanistic data linking this dietary pattern during pregnancy to inflammation and birth outcomes. In an ethnically diverse cohort of 1057 mother-child pairs, we estimated the relationships between dietary inflammatory poten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
102
1
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
102
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Continued work across species will be useful in clarifying the role of specific inflammatory markers on child cognitive ability and executive functioning. Studies that elucidate the down-stream factors contributing to prenatal inflammation are needed, as well as studies examining potential mechanisms [e.g., epigenetic alterations (McCullough et al, (2017)] that may help explain the link between immune activity and measures of cognitive ability and executive functioning. To the extent that early child cognitive and executive functioning abilities are a harbinger for physical and mental health outcomes over the life-course, understanding the role of maternal gestational immune activity could be useful for early identification and remediation of long-term deleterious outcomes with high societal impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continued work across species will be useful in clarifying the role of specific inflammatory markers on child cognitive ability and executive functioning. Studies that elucidate the down-stream factors contributing to prenatal inflammation are needed, as well as studies examining potential mechanisms [e.g., epigenetic alterations (McCullough et al, (2017)] that may help explain the link between immune activity and measures of cognitive ability and executive functioning. To the extent that early child cognitive and executive functioning abilities are a harbinger for physical and mental health outcomes over the life-course, understanding the role of maternal gestational immune activity could be useful for early identification and remediation of long-term deleterious outcomes with high societal impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, higher maternal E‐DII scores (mean E‐DII of 0.42, range of −4.39 to 5.52) were associated with higher risk of LBW. McCullough et al examined maternal DII (median E‐DII of −1.37, range of −5.00 to 4.96) and birth outcomes in a multi‐ethnic population (43% African‐American, 34% White and 23% Hispanic) but found no association with birthweight, only with adverse pregnancy outcomes (higher caesarean delivery rate in mothers with obesity). Conversely in Project Viva, a cohort comprising mother–child pairs (70.6% White race, mean DII of −2.6 ± 1.4), a pro‐inflammatory diet in pregnancy was associated with LBW, consistent with our findings, and also infant adiposity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent data from the Healthy Start Study showed that higher DII scores in mothers with obesity were associated with increased neonatal adiposity . Ethnic diversity and maternal weight status during pregnancy may contribute to the disparity between studies. Black race, Hispanic ethnicity and higher maternal BMI were associated with a more higher E‐DII scores in both studies, while older maternal age and higher household income and education were associated with lower E‐DII score, consistent with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations